Response to Dave Hunt on Reformed Theology, Part 3 of 3, Atonement and Consistency

Again, Dr. White demonstrates how Dave Hunt has bitten off more than he can chew in taking on Reformed theology at his current level of understanding. Hunt is confused in thinking that biblical appeals to repent refute Calvinism. Dr. White explains the necessity of consistency in apologetics with the example that Hunt appeals to aspects of the concept of penal substitutionary atonement when dealing with Roman Catholics, which is a concept that can only cohere with the Reformed perspective.