00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
All right, well, good morning.
It's a bright sunny day. All right, well, what I hope to do
this morning is move on, move on, and we're gonna talk today
about the Davidic covenant. We've spent enough time criticizing
Kleinian republication than last week, the kissing cousin to what's
now called Two Kingdoms. I don't want to spend too much
time being polemical, that is, arguing against what we think
certain things are teaching. There's a place for that, but
we also need to talk about what we're for, what we believe. So
hopefully we're going to have a bit better balance at this
point. Not that anybody criticized what
we were doing, but I don't want us to just constantly harp on
what's wrong with everybody else. So let's move on to the Davidic
Covenant. And this, of course, deals with
David. So let's turn to 2 Samuel chapter
7. 2 Samuel chapter 7. You see it there, the ESV, right
there in the heading. The Lord's Covenant with David.
We can thank the publishers for that. Makes it easy to find,
right? Now when the king lived in his house and the Lord had
given him rest from all his surrounding enemies, the king said to Nathan
the prophet, see now I dwell in a house of cedar, but the
ark of God dwells in a tent. And Nathan said to the king,
go, do all that is in your heart for the Lord is with you. But
that same night the word of the Lord came to Nathan, go and tell
my servant David, thus says the Lord, would you build me a house
to dwell in? I have not lived in a house since
the day I brought up the people of Israel from Egypt to this
day, but I have been moving about in a tent for my dwelling. In
all places where I have moved with all the people of Israel,
did I speak a word with any of the judges of Israel, whom I
commanded to shepherd my people Israel, saying, Why have you
not built me a house of cedar? Now therefore, thus you shall
say to my servant David, thus says the Lord of hosts, I took
you from the pasture from following the sheep that you should be
prince over my people Israel. And I have been with you wherever
you went and have cut off all your enemies from before you.
And I will make for you a great name, like the name of the great
ones of the earth. And I will appoint a place for
my people, Israel, and will plant them so that they may dwell in
their own place and be disturbed no more. And violent men shall
afflict them no more, as formerly, from the time that I appointed
judges over my people, Israel. And I will give you rest from
all your enemies. Moreover, The Lord declares to
you that the Lord will make you a house. When your days are fulfilled
and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring
after you, who shall come from your body, and I will establish
his kingdom. He shall build a house for my
name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.
I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son. When
he commits iniquity, I will discipline him with the rod of men, with
the stripes of the sons of men. But my steadfast love will not
depart from him as I took it from Saul, whom I put away from
before you. And your house and your kingdom
shall be made sure forever before me. Your throne shall be established
forever. In accordance with all these
words and in accordance with all this vision, Nathan spoke
to David. All right, so here we are. We've moved on to David, finally. We're familiar with David. Of
course, you know, every Sunday school class at one time or another,
in kids' class, they talk about David and Goliath and things
like that. And that's certainly true. Shepherd
David and so forth. Let me just ask this first, and
this is kind of a odd question to kind of start things out.
In the passage that we read, did anybody notice something
missing? The word covenant, somebody's
already been thinking about this. And so here you have the ESV
and the publishers of the ESV having the Lord's covenant with
David as a heading right there at the beginning of 2 Samuel
7. And the word covenant's not even
in the text. Okay, so that kind of gives us
a bit of an issue. Not really. The ESV's right,
even though their words are not inspired. It is accurate that
this is a covenant. which I hope to bring out with
other passages, but just some things to keep in mind. And this,
some of what I'm talking about really does come from J. Ligon
Duncan's lectures on covenant theology. So, I mean, a lot of
other people say the same things, but I looked at his and he had
some good stuff to say. And this is an exact quote from
him. This passage offers one of the
most significant moments in God's dealing with his people under
the old covenant, because the establishment of the house of
David is an integral part in God's master plan to crush the
head of the serpent. So you see how Duncan portrays
the Davidic covenant as being an aspect of the promise, really
the threat, made to Satan in the garden. This covenant helps to establish
that there will be a king that will crush the head of the serpent. If you would turn to Psalm 78,
because Duncan does mention this, and this is good. Psalm 78 is
a lengthy psalm. As far as I remember, it is the
second longest psalm, and it is very much a historical. And for those that are a bit
more picky, an historical, okay. Psalm 78, and in particular verses
67 to 72. He rejected the tent of Joseph. He did not choose the tribe of
Ephraim, but he chose the tribe of Judah. Mount Zion, which he
loves, he built his sanctuary like the high heavens, like the
earth, which he has founded forever. He chose David, his servant,
and took him from the sheepfolds. From following the nursing ewes,
he brought him to shepherd Jacob, his people, Israel, his inheritance. With upright heart, he shepherded
them and guided them with his skillful hand." So clearly, the
psalmist, in Psalm 78 there, sees David as being a fulfillment. This is a blessing to God's people,
that David was to be a blessing. So given the fact that Psalm
78 is itself a redemptive historical psalm, you can read through it. You can see the history of Israel. It climaxes in this psalm with
David. So that's the significance. Establishment
of David to be one who would uphold and rule in a godly manner. Now, some context, if we think
back to 2 Samuel 7, some simple context to keep in mind. The
civil war between Saul's family, now Saul, of course, was already
dead, and David had just ended. David was established as king
over both, not just Judah, but also the other 10 tribes, so
all of Israel. You may remember after Saul's
death, Judah made David king. But the northern tribes, now,
they still had the house of Saul. And there was civil war for seven
years, and eventually came to the point where Israel wrapped
things up and said, no, David, you're the guy. After seven years
of civil war, that's kind of interesting. I always found that
fascinating. So that's over. The other significant
thing is that you see this really, a lot of this in chapter five
and six, that David had captured Jerusalem and made it his capital. When Israel entered into the
promised land, they did not take Jerusalem, Salem, the Jebusites. And so 400 years while in the
promised land through the time of the judges, Jerusalem was
not theirs. David took it. Another significant event. David
brings the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. And what's the
Ark signify? Presence of God. Particularly,
especially as we think about the Ark of the Covenant and the
seraphim, he is seated between the seraphim. We talk about the
mercy seat, but it is also his throne. It symbolizes his throne. So it's God's rule, and that's
significant. And then of course, you look
at chapter seven, verse one, God gave David rest from all
his enemies. These are the significant things,
the background that helps us to see the significance of right
here, right now, the establishment of the Davidic covenant. Now,
as was already mentioned, we do not see the word covenant
take place. And you can think way back to
when we first started talking about, for instance, the covenant
of works, however many months ago that was. that the word covenant
was not there, and that has led some to believe, well, there
really wasn't a covenant with Adam in creation, because the
word's not used, and we talked about how Hosea 8 specifically
says covenant with Adam, and even talked about some of the
controversy of the translation there. So the word itself does
not necessarily have to be there. It's sort of a variation of the
word concept fallacy, that if the word is not there, then the
concept must not be there. That's kind of nonsense. Well,
we have a similar situation. If you would turn to Psalm 89, And I mean, this sounds obvious,
but Psalm 89 follows Psalm 88. Well, of course it does. That's
how numbers work. But you think about Psalm 88
and Psalm 88 is a dark Psalm. That is a man who is in deep,
deep distress. And then you come to Psalm 89.
Right at the beginning, I will sing of the steadfast love of
the Lord forever. With my mouth, I will make known
your faithfulness to all generations. For I said, steadfast love will
be built up forever. In heaven, you will establish
your faithfulness. "'You have said, "'I have made
a covenant with my chosen one. "'I have sworn to David my servant.'"
And he goes on after that. And notice in verse four, the
heart of it, which we're gonna look at in 2 Samuel 7, "'I will
establish your offspring forever "'and build your throne for all
generations.'" Okay, so you see Psalm 89, Now you think back, I alluded
to this, but think back to way when we talked about the covenant
of works and the lack of the word there and Hosea talking
about the covenant which they broke, covenant made with Adam.
And there are technically some things to consider
as to why some might say it's in Adam, the place Adam, as opposed
to the person Adam. I think that's a pretty weak
argument. And also instead of the person Adam, just mankind
in general, that's another interpretation. But in this text in Psalm 89,
you don't have that issue. That issue's not there at all. There is no debate that I have
seen anywhere, not that I've been all over, as to what this text is saying.
God established a covenant with David, full stop. And you can
even look to Psalm 132, Among the last, it's the longest
of the Psalms of ascent. Verses 11 and 12. The Lord swore
to David a sure oath from which he will not turn back. One of
the sons of your body I will set on your throne. If your sons
keep my covenant and my testimonies that I shall teach them, their
sons also forever shall sit on your throne." Notice the language
there, covenant. Now, the focus in Psalm 132 is
the offspring of David, but nevertheless, it's the same promise. So covenant
is clear. So though the word covenant does
not occur in 2 Samuel 7, the rest of Scripture clearly sees
that when God came through Nathan the prophet to David, that a
covenant was established. Jonathan, did you have a question? basically the first half. Uh-huh. I would say that that is a legitimate
inference, particularly when you read what Paul says in Ephesians
about Christ being exalted and we are seated in the heavenlies
with him, in him. So there is something to that. I wasn't quite going to go there,
but you're definitely not wrong. Conrad? Yeah. That's true. That's true. That's the one side
that some have made it a bit difficult and maybe this is some
sort of different type of thing. This is where dispensationalists
love this kind of stuff. Correct, absolutely. And even
with Moses. So, for instance, let's turn
to Deuteronomy chapter 17. Deuteronomy chapter 17, beginning
at verse 14. And by the way, as you're turning
there, this is where biblical criticism, whether it's higher
criticism, textual criticism, criticize this, criticize that,
whatever. They look at passages like this
in Deuteronomy 17, the second half, and you see the ESV has
a heading there, Laws Concerning Israel's Kings. Well, some redactor
put that in there later. That's because they don't believe
in prophecy. They don't believe in the supernatural
working of God. And they do that with much of
Deuteronomy. So anyway, be that as it may,
when you come, this is verse 14, when you come to the land
that the Lord your God is giving you and you possess it and dwell
in it and then say, I will set a king over me like all the nations
that are around me, you may indeed set a king over you whom the
Lord your God will choose. one from among your brothers
you shall set as king over you. You may not put a foreigner over
you who is not your brother, only he must not acquire many
horses for himself or cause a people to return to Egypt in order to
acquire many horses, since the Lord has said to you, you shall
never return that way again. And he shall not acquire many
wives for himself, lest his heart turn away, nor shall he acquire
for himself excessive silver and gold. And when he sits on
the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself a book,
in a book, a copy of this law approved by the Levitical priests. and it shall be with him, and
he shall read it in all the days of his life, that he may learn
to fear the Lord his God by keeping all the words of this law and
these statutes and doing them, that his heart may not be lifted
up above his brothers, and that he may not turn aside from the
commandment, either to the right or to the left, so that he may
continue long in his kingdom, he and his children in Israel. So here you have, even in Moses,
rules for a king. And you see how connected all
of this is. It is quite remarkable. It's
almost as if God planned it that way. I'm sorry, I'm being a bit
facetious, I realize. So you have in Deuteronomy 17,
the kind of king that God's people need. They do set them to, hey,
give us a king like the other nations. And you think about
that when you read that in 1 Samuel and the leading up to Saul. And
we always talk about how, yep, God heard what they said and
he gave it to them. But I wonder sometimes, and I
don't have any proof of this, if Deuteronomy 17 was going through
the minds of some of the people. I mean, because they do ask in
a similar fashion to what Deuteronomy 17 says, I will put a king over
me as the other nations. Well, God kind of took that,
turned it around and said, okay, I'll give you another king just
like the other nations. And of course, I got Saul. Before I continue and start picking
apart 2 Samuel 7, any questions or comments so far? Chris? Yeah, actually Duncan in his
lecture does talk about that a bit. He touches on the reality
that Nathan comes and he just said, hey, go do what you want.
The Lord's with you. Now part of that was accurate.
Obviously the Lord was with him because he gave him rest from
all his enemies. He established a kingdom, et
cetera, et cetera. But then the word of the Lord
comes to Nathan. Now it's interesting because
God didn't send another prophet. He sent Nathan back so that David
knew two things, that Nathan still is a prophet and that really
Nathan kind of jumped the gun with what he said. That's kind
of the short of it. So God in his mercy really upholds
Nathan's integrity, if you think about it, by sending him back
with the word of the Lord. So, and David doesn't object,
David doesn't say, hey, but you told me, he just says, he just
obeys, he recognizes it. And he probably recognized that
Nathan jumped the gun, the word of the Lord comes and then that's
that. All right, so we think about
2 Samuel 7, he's got rest on all sides and David notices,
I've got this house of cedar, Must have smelled nice, right? No moths, right. They didn't
have a moth problem, that's for sure. And he sees that the Ark
of the Covenant, the thing that represents God's throne is in
a tent. And you think about that and
you're just like, well, I kind of feel for David. I would agree
with that. I'm here, I've got this nice
place, but somebody who's better than me is in a tent. And so he decides he's going
to build a house for the Lord. Now, I would also say that about
the only thing wrong with what David is wishing for here is
being a bit impulsive. He's drawing an unnecessary conclusion. But I think his motive was good. He understood, and in fact, he
realized, I'm not worthy to be in this house of cedar. Why would
God's throne be in a tent if I'm in this house? And so he
wants to build a house for Lord. Now, At this point, you notice in
verse two, and even with verse three, David doesn't explicitly
say it in these verses that I wanna build a house, but clearly that's
the implication. God's throne is in a tent, I'm
in a house of cedar. Nathan, hey, go do what your
heart desires. So the word of the Lord comes.
And you look through, God rehashes what he did for David, And it
really, it's when you get down to verse 12 in particular, but not just verse 12, there's
a few different places. Duncan brings out the point that
what you see where David was concerned to build a house for
God, God turns it around with a play on words and says he's
going to build for David a house. Now it's the same word in the
Hebrew and it's kind of humorous if I can go off on a slight tangent.
I can remember taking Hebrew in seminary, and one of the ways
to help me remember, and others, the Hebrew word for house, general
word for house, it's bayet. And so you see a house you like,
you buy it. You see, you get that, little
tricks. Well, that's why, and you go
through 2 Samuel 7, you look at the Hebrew word there, there
it is, all throughout. And so God is wonderful at language. He's doing a play on words. You intended to build me a house,
David, but I'm gonna build you into a house. Now house is a
broad word in Hebrew. It can refer to the physical
structure, but it can also refer to a temple. It could refer to
a palace. But what else could it refer
to? Lineage. What are some other words for
lineage? Family, okay. Like the house of Jacob. Now, we're talking in general
terms, but think king. What's a good word for all of
this? Think royalty. There you go, dynasty. He's establishing
a dynasty with David's house, pun intended. So God uses this
play on words. You wanted to build me a house.
No, I'm going to build you into a house. So that's the key thing
with respect to this covenant. Yeah, Conrad. That's correct. That's correct. And that's a key point. And when
we think about the tent and the tabernacle and even the temple,
the whole point was to show in a picture fashion, if you will,
that God dwells in the midst of his people. That's the point.
Where his people go, God goes. And of course, we know that's
fulfilled in Christ. Where his church is, that's where
Christ is. And we'll talk about that more
to be sure. But there are other things. In
terms of building a dynasty for royalty, what's required? Offspring. Yeah. Well, duh. Well, right. Sometimes things
are the obvious answer. If you're going to have a dynasty,
there's got to be children that come along, offspring. Anybody
want to guess? Think back on all that we've
talked about throughout this with covenant theology. What
word is used for offspring? What's the literal translation
of the word? Seed. And that is the case here. Your seed, that is a key word. We hearken that all the way back
to Genesis 3. The seed of a woman that will
crush the head of the serpent. So God to David through Nathan,
that this offspring who will be on the throne will be from
his own flesh and blood, his offspring, his seed. This heir
will fulfill David's desire by building a house for God. And
it's just fascinating, this play on words, because we know that
Solomon, as the immediate successor to David, did accomplish that
in time and space. But the truth of the matter is
God accomplished it all throughout redemptive history in the person
and work of Jesus Christ. Everybody see that? Okay, just
make it sure the caffeine's kicked in for everybody. So this heir will fulfill David's
desire by building a house for God. There's a unique relationship. The language that is used here
of David's seed, I will be his father and he shall be my son. That's actually much more focused
than what we see in the promise given to Abraham. I will be your
God and you will be my people. Now it's focused on an individual. I will be his father and he shall
be my son. And you think about that and
how it is true in the person of Solomon, but how that is ultimately
true in Jesus Christ. Jonathan? Yep. Well, it is the house that comes
out of Christ. And then, but we also need to
understand and remember David or Christ is, according to his
human nature, a descendant of David. And that's the issue. And as you think this through,
and you start unpacking all this, and it's all those who are in
Christ. Now, even if you think in terms, well, we're all Gentiles,
and this is a particular area where you got this dispensational
mindset, which is unfortunate. But even in the Old Testament,
Gentiles could become Israelites. How? There was a set way of thinking. Paul in Ephesians chapter two,
we love Ephesians two because that's where we get our Calvinistic
doctrine, but it's the second half of Ephesians two that's
really important here. We are a part of the one people
of God. There are not two peoples. There's
one person, one body, same covenant. Same promises to the Gentiles. We are brought into the commonwealth
of Israel. That's Paul's language there
in the second half of Ephesians 2. Plus what Paul argues in Romans
11 about Gentiles being grafted in. We're not a separate tree. So we really do become true Israelites
by virtue of our adoption because of what Christ has accomplished.
Conrad? Correct. Right. No, it can't. But there is a
sense where it can refer to Christ. In the imputation of our sin
to him. He is reckoned as one who sins. And what happens? He's disciplined. on the day in which he sinned,
he died. Yeah. All right, so other things with
respect to David. I talked about his own flesh
and blood, the seed, the heir will build the house, this unique
relationship that is even more focused and intimate than what
the words were to Abraham. It's this promise, and this we
take from the perspective of Solomon. He may experience punishment
for sin, but not cast off as Saul was. not cast off as Saul was. And then finally, David's kingdom
will last forever. Now the prophets later interpreted
all of this, and the Psalms too, as being fulfilled in the person
of the Messiah. And of course, we know the Messiah
as our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. The New Testament sees
this, even at Pentecost. Back when I kind of going back,
but as we see in Pentecost, Peter expounding and interpreting the
events of the spirit being poured out and everybody sees what's
going on. He uses Joel chapter 2. He refers
to the Abrahamic covenant and he refers to the Davidic covenant
as all of this lumped together. And so the fulfillment is found
ultimately in Christ. Now, here's my question for you. What's the sign of this covenant? Okay, the crown or the throne,
you can put it one for the other. If you would turn to second,
or excuse me, not second, 1 Chronicles. Now the word here is not specifically
used, but it is a fascinating piece of wording that we see
here in 1 Chronicles 29, particularly really the second half of verse
22. which the ESV has broken up there
with that Solomon anointed king. That second half there of verse
22. And they made Solomon the son
of David king the second time and they anointed him as prince
for the Lord and Zadok as priest. Then Solomon sat on the throne
of the Lord as king. in place of David, his father. And David's throne is ultimately
the throne of the Lord, and that's the point. That's really the
point. And actually, the Psalms do this. They do this same thing, where
they have the emerging, if you will, in Palmer Robertson, not
in his book, The Christ and the Covenants, but in his book, The
Flow of the Psalms, which the men's study did that some years
ago. And that's what sparked me preaching through the Psalms
in the evening. So you can think, that was a
long time ago. Yeah, it was. I would commend that book. Now,
if I take a step back, let me just give a caveat to that book. As some of you know, I used to
be a math teacher. So my mind is always logical,
deductive reasoning. Palmer Robertson in his book
is very inductive, but he does make a good case. See, I'm of
the sort, inductive reasoning doesn't really prove anything.
It just shows patterns. Now inductive reasoning is helpful
to disprove a proposition, but ultimately it doesn't prove something. So Palmer Robertson's book on
the flow of the Psalms, it's very inductive. There's some
deductive stuff too, but he sees some rather interesting patterns
as you run through the Psalms. And I think I've told the men
who have been part of that study that are here now are gonna hear
me say something I said back then. So you can fall asleep
for a few minutes if you want, that's okay. But what Palmer Robertson did
in this book was truly astounding. He was able to show that there
really is a purpose in the order of all the books, all of the
Psalms. Now, as I said, pretty inductive,
observations, patterns, references to other things in scripture.
But one of the things with respect to the Davidic covenant that
he does try to establish is clearly in the Psalms, they see the Messiah
as the one who descends from David. And there's this merging
of the Davidic throne, the throne of Messiah, with God's throne. And notice what we see here in
1 Chronicles 29. Solomon is seated, not on the
throne of David, although that's true, he's seated on the throne
of the Lord, Jehovah. That's a foreshadow of who the
Messiah really is. The one who is both David's son
and David's Lord. This is Psalm 110. The Lord said
to my Lord, sit at my right hand. That's the place of authority.
And so the Davidic covenant is establishing for us the principle
that one person will rule the kingdom and that will be the
Messiah. That's really what this is all
driving at. Thoughts, comments, questions?
Jake? That's correct. Right. And it doesn't even matter if
you're circumcised. Yeah. Well, yeah, they had a they had a hard
problem. Even the Judaizers who tried
to claim Christ, that was their issue. But Paul in Galatians
tells us that Abraham is our father. And so there is a connection
with Abraham. The fact that Paul in Ephesians
2, this is the language that Paul uses, Ephesians 2 verse
12, remember that you were at that time separated from Christ,
meaning before they became Christians. You were separated from Christ. alienated from the commonwealth
of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise. And so
Paul is making it clear that the connection of all of it and
really what the Judaizers and really all Jews should have recognized
is that the key aspect is the Messiah. That's where it lies. That's who it lies in. And so,
but he still uses this language, commonwealth of Israel. He still
uses this language, covenants of promise, having no hope without
God in the world. But now, so in contrast to the
way they once were, to what they are now, now in Christ Jesus,
you who were once far off, far off from what? The Commonwealth
of Israel, the covenants of promise. You have been brought near by
the blood of Christ, for he himself is our peace, who has made us
both one, and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall
of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed
in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man
in place of the two. so making peace and might reconcile
us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the
hostility. And he continues about the language
of the two being brought near. And so all of this is truly fulfilled
in Christ and the language of nation. We're still part of the
Commonwealth of Israel, truly, because it is Christ Jesus who
reigns on the throne of David. the throne of Jehovah, the throne
of the Lord. We are children of Abraham through
faith. Trish? Right, right. Conrad? Correct, and that's really the
point of Hebrews 11. We turn to the beginning of Hebrews
12, since we're surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses, and
those witnesses are what you see in Hebrews 11, the wall of
faith, the hall of faith. The point there, yeah, it's true. You can look through the names
listed in that hall of faith in Hebrews chapter 11 to help
encourage your faith. Look at these examples of faith,
and that's true. But it goes so much deeper. All
of those Old Testament names, They are described as not having
received what was promised because they were looking forward. They
were looking forward to Christ. That includes David. That's why
David could say in Psalm 110, Jehovah said to my Lord, And
this is David's son. How could David's son be David's
Lord? Well, it's because Jesus Christ
is both human and divine. He's the appointed one who builds
the house, and he builds the house through Jesus Christ. That's
what the physical temple pointed to. That's what the tabernacle
pointed to. We're kind of past time, so I
hate to do that to all of you. All right, we gotta close. We'll
try to pick up and maybe polish this off some more next week.
So let's close in prayer. Our Father in God and heaven,
we do thank you that our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ does
indeed fulfill all of the covenant promises you made all throughout
redemptive history. And we thank you that you have
fulfilled the promise that one would sit on your throne forever
descending from David, none other than, again, our Lord and Savior,
Jesus Christ. And so, Lord, we pray, prepare
our hearts and minds as we're about to come into your presence
to worship and adore you. We pray all this in Christ's
name, amen.
Covenant Theology (29): Davidic Covenant, part 1
Series Covenant Theology
| Sermon ID | 42323202536291 |
| Duration | 50:02 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday School |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.