00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
Verse one of chapter two, my
little children, I'm writing these things to you so that you
may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an
advocate with the father, Jesus Christ, the righteous. And he
himself is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only,
but also for those of the whole world. by this we know that we
have come to know him if we keep his commandments the one who
says I've come to know him and does not keep his commandments
is a liar and the truth is not in him but whoever keeps his
word and him the love of God has been truly perfected by this
we know that we are in him the one who says he abides in him
ought himself to walk in the same manner as he walked what
a glorious passage isn't it let me get my clock going here that way I don't
preach till midnight I get going sometimes and I have a hard time
shutting up well last week we took opportunity
to look at the first verse and that we see that the Apostle
says that if anyone sins, the Apostle says that I'm writing
these things to you so that you do not sin. We made some comments
about them that Christians sin. Born again, forgiven, justified,
believers, sin. secondarily justified believers
fight sin and that is the great difference between the regenerate
and an unregenerate person the unregenerate person is under
the power of sin he's a slave to his sins but the regenerate
person at the cross the Lord Jesus Christ broke the power
of sin and set the captive free and so we are not bound we're
not subjects of sin any longer we're slaves but not to sin we're
slaves of Christ Doulas in the Greek were slaves of the Lord
Jesus Christ But he goes on and says this if anyone says we talk
about he fights we fight sin. We've got a weapon He says I'm
writing these things to you that you may not sin and God's given
his word to us Which is an effectual weapon against sin but then he
goes into verse 2 that if we sin if anyone sins and if you
will remember what I taught you last week that that in in the
Greek that would have it has a strong emphasis upon if anyone
sins and you're going to we already know that this is not teaching
sinless perfectionism it's not teaching Wesleyan ism It's not
at all, it's teaching us that Christians do miss the mark still. It's about the governing principle
of our life that we are still battling, that war is still being
waged on the inside of us. We're seeing the newness, the
new life that is in Jesus Christ and there's still that old remnant
that is still there that we must contend against, the flesh. And
by the way, I didn't know if I mentioned this last week, one
of these days that flesh battle is going to be completely over.
We're gonna be with Christ, we're gonna be perfected, we're gonna
be glorified, and our propensity to sin will be forevermore over. In heaven there will be no sin.
There's no tempter there. I don't know about you, but that
makes me feel good, to know that the Lord is gonna perfect His
people, and that when we are communing forever with our Lord
in heaven, that there's not going to be what we now know as normal,
that other side of the story. Or as Paul Harvey would say,
the rest of the story. You know, we're born again, we
love the Lord, but there's still that war that goes on on the
inside of us. And the other side of the story is, is that there's
that flesh spirit thing that goes on on the inside of us.
And there is the joy of the Christian life and there's the groan of
the reality that we still have a battle to fight. Then he goes
on and talks about verses and verse the end of verse one in
the beginning I talked about this just in moments before we
closed last week the believers advocate the believers advocate
if anyone sins we have an advocate with the father Jesus Christ
the righteous and he himself is the propitiation for our sins
and not I don't want to go back and re-preach all that I preached
last week because this is online if you want to listen to it it's
at gracelifeprior.org. Last week we talked momentarily
about Jesus being our advocate that Christ he performed a satisfaction
on our behalf and he's a the propitiation for our sins. And then it says that he is our
advocate with the father Paracletus. And if you'll remember back in
John 14 for those of you that are with us on the Lord's Day
that we taught through John 14 and the teaching upon the Holy
Spirit and the Holy Spirit of God is referred to as the Paraclete
the Paraclete us. And we have that very same term
in the Greek language being facilitated here by the Apostle John and
he's referencing Jesus in his advocacy for us. He pleads with
us. We remember last week we talked
just in short about what Paul mentioned in Romans chapter 8
when he says, who will bring a charge against God's elect? And that is the church. That
is the redeemed people of God. Who's going to bring a charge
against us because we have an advocate. with the father the Lord Jesus
Christ and Paul goes on to say in Romans 8 34 who is the one
who condemns Jesus Christ is he who died yes rather who was
raised and is at the right hand of God who intercedes advocates
for us not only that but look back at our text that says it's
Jesus Christ the righteous one Jesus Christ the righteous that's
how John is describing and identifying the Lord Jesus Christ and I think
that the pertinent question to be asked here in lieu of the
context is what sense is John using this term and of course
we know that there are those that believe whenever you look
at what the commentators write about this text that believe
that he's talking about the judicial righteousness of the father that
the father has applied to a believer's account on the basis and the
grounds of the righteousness of Christ but I don't believe
that's the context here now we all do understand that whenever
a A Christian is born again. God applies to us the very righteousness
of Christ. It's an imputed righteousness.
I made mention of this last week. Abraham believed God, and God
credited it to him as righteousness. God accounted him as righteous. He perceived him. He treated
him like he was righteous. But you have to understand, Abraham
was not intrinsically Righteous and this is Abram of the of the
of the Chaldeans And if you have anything about the history of
the Chaldeans They are not the kind of people that you want
to move in next door Abraham was not intrinsically
righteous He was counted as righteous because he believed God and whenever
we trust Jesus Christ when we believe upon him God credits
the righteousness of Christ to you. God treats you the way that
he treats his son. We're adopted into the family
on the basis of the merit of Jesus Christ. This is Christianity,
but oftentimes pulpits fail to teach this. So what kind of righteousness
is it speaking of here? He's speaking about advocacy,
isn't he? Now, think with me just for a
moment. I just want the wheels of our minds to be turning. He's
talking about advocacy on the part of a believer who has sinned.
And if if one sins he has an advocate with the Father Jesus
Christ and I believe that this when he makes mention of Jesus
Christ the righteous as best understood as the righteousness
of the character of Christ which governs the nature of his advocacy
for us Does that make sense? It governs the nature. I don't
believe he's talking in this sense about the imputed righteousness. I don't believe that's what he's
speaking about at all. I believe it's referring to the faithfulness
of Christ to our cause, and he presents the case before God
based on his substitution, that which he has won for us on the
cross, and he does that faithfully and with perfection. Let me just
give an illustration. We have a less than perfect legal
system, and those of us that are in law enforcement know that
quite well. One of the most difficult parts of my job back whenever
I was in law enforcement before I retired was going to court,
oftentimes on crimes against children or sex crimes against
little girls, and oftentimes that through loopholes, legal
loopholes, guilty parties are released to go out and harm innocent
children. I remember one specific case
I worked 954 counts of lewd molestation against a little girl, and the
guy walked out of the courtroom on a legal loophole, looked at
the little girl and blew a kiss to her as he was walking out. That's what I was doing. I was
actually reaching for steel, but I knew I couldn't shoot him
in the courtroom. It hurt and what hurt worse was to look at
that little girl with the tears rolling out of her eyes by the
time she was 16 years old. I mentioned this to illustrate
the point. When Jesus Christ is acting as
the righteous advocate, he never uses and goes to loopholes in
that advocacy. He's righteous. The court system
that we have now is flawed because flawed men govern it. Flawed
men wrote the laws that we enforce. And so the whole thing is based
upon the premise of imperfection, but not Christ's. Whenever he
pleads and advocates for us before the Father, it is righteous advocacy. It's not tainted. It's not corrupted. And I believe that's the basis
of what John is describing here. Jesus Christ, the righteous,
that advocates with absolute perfection according to the perfections
of his nature and his character. His advocacy is upright. His
advocacy is pure. His advocacy is holy. And there's
no loopholes. Third, we see it says that Jesus
is the atoning sacrifice. It says he himself is the propitiation
for our sins. And what that means is simply
this, that on the cross, when Jesus went to the cross, there
is divine love taking the initiative to act on the behalf of sin slave
rebels just like you and me. divine initiative acting 1st
John 4 10 illustrates at best is in this is love not that we
love God in this is what not that we love God so we see the
premise is not us the initiative and the beginning point in salvation
is not with us but that he loved us 1st John 4 10 and he sent
his own son to be the propitiation for our sins Propitiation is
a frightful kind of a word. It sounds very theological. It
sounds possibly a hint sophisticated, but it's not. It's just simply
a Bible term that you and I need to understand. And it has the
connotation in the appeasing of an offended party. The Baker
Encyclopedia of Bible Terms defines propitiation as the turning away
of anger by the offering of a gift. So to understand the word propitiation,
which is in scripture repetitiously, we've got to understand that
God is holy and that God hates sin. God has a God-sized capacity
to have holy anger against what he hates. One source said it this way,
his anger is the settled opposition of his holy nature to everything
that is evil. everything that is evil God hates
it and it's unbiblical for us to view God if we don't understand
that God has anger holy anger righteous anger we're living
in a world that wants to redefine everything we want to redefine
God that God is a God of all love with no wrath a God of all
of all goodness with no anger it's not biblical God's given
us a disclosure of who he is. He's done that in scripture. Listen to what the Bible says
in Psalms 711. God is a just God and God is
angry with the wicked every day. In the Hebrew, the word angry
means angry. God is a just God and God is
angry with the wicked every day. And of course, in modernistic
terms, we would try to redefine that, that, well, it really doesn't
mean angry. And then if we show in the original where it does
mean angry, then we'll say, well, nobody's wicked. Or maybe he's
angry at Charles Manson, but he's not angry at me. And then
you have to go to what God says in his word about all men being
under sin, and that in light of God's perfection, in light
of God's burning white hot holiness, we being sinful, and sin's not
out here, sin is in here, God defines us as wicked. Romans 2. The Apostle Paul tells
us that God's storing up wrath for sinners, we're all sinners,
against the day of wrath. And these terms are, they're
frightful. The thoughts about God being
angry with me are terrible thoughts. I'm not speaking about you, I'm
speaking about me. As a sinner, apart from what
Jesus Christ did, I understand I'm born again. I understand
that Jesus has already satisfied God's wrath regarding my sins.
I've been born again. God saved me in his mercy. But
if I contemplate God's anger now as a redeemed sinner, that
if Jesus hadn't acted on my behalf, God being a just God, God being
a holy God, me being a sinner, what I would have to face on
the day of judgment is terrible. God is not a corrupt judge like
what we have in this country. God doesn't let guilty child
molesters walk out of the courtroom thumbing their nose at their
victims. And in the court of divine justice,
the victim is God. David said this against you and
you alone have I sinned. You think about that. Well, wait
a minute. He killed Uriah. He slept with Bathsheba. He took
that man's little lamb. He sinned against them. Whose
law did David violate? Who set the ordinance that thou
shalt not kill? Was it Uriah? No, it was God. So whenever David sinned, he
sinned against God foremost. We're not any different. Whenever
I sin, I sin against God. I've offended God. And so understanding
the judgment of God, it is very frightful to think about me being
looked upon by God as him being angry with me. But biblical Christianity
insists that God is in fact angry with the unrepentant wicked.
And the reason that we believe that is because the scriptures
of God are ripe with that kind of terminology. And we also have
to understand that we can't point to our neighbor without first
looking at our own hearts, honestly. Romans 3.9, Paul said this, we're
all under sin. Romans 3.19, Paul says, we're
all guilty before God. He says that we've all outraged
God's grace. We've all trampled the blood
of Christ under our feet by our own disobedience to the truth.
Hebrews 10.29. Yeah, I was talking about you too. And
God is angry, and we are in need of His anger, propitiation, to
be turned away. Listen, you're never going to
understand what this is teaching in 1 John chapter 2 unless you understand
these terms that there needs be. And Christ did, in fact,
satisfy God's wrath in that act where He turned away God's wrath
away from those who would believe upon Jesus Christ is what we
call propitiation. And listen, the gift offered
was Jesus, God's only begotten Son. and that he offered his
own holy blood upon the cross, and there he absorbed God's anger
that has owed me, that has owed you. God is angry. We are in need
of his anger to be turned away by the offering of a gift. And
John here says he himself is the propitiation for our sins. That should leave our mouth open
like, oh, to the glory and the praise of his grace. Oh, to the
glory and the praise of his grace. You know, it never ceases to
boggle my imagination that there are people that call themselves
by the name of Christ and they've become numb to or bored with
what Christ has done on the cross. And they say this regarding the
gospel that we need to remove and to move on from the gospel.
Yeah, we need the gospel to get saved, but God's got something
better and higher for us other than the gospel. Are you kidding
me? What is better and higher and
more glorious than the cross of Jesus Christ? Are you kidding me? He bore God's
wrath for me. He propitiated for my sin. The punishment that was due me
was laid upon the shoulders of the Lord Christ. He bore the
wrath of God for me and in my stead. And Jesus is the propitiation
for my sins and our sins because Jesus became sin and he was punished
for my sin. Isaiah spoke in terms that are
fit for the thought of propitiation. Listen to Isaiah 53, four and
five. Surely his griefs, or our griefs, he himself bore. Our
sorrows he carried. Yet we ourselves esteemed him
stricken and smitten of God and afflicted. Listen to this. He was pierced through for our
transgressions. He was crushed for our iniquities. The chastening punishment for
our well-being fell upon him. By his scourging, some translation,
stripes, beating, we are healed. And if you go on and read verse
10 of Isaiah 53, it tells us that God was crushing his son.
I mean, these are not terms that are just casually approached. This is serious. That God crushed
his son in justice so that he might mete out mercy to us. Propitiation. The next thing
I want you to understand that atonement and this whole issue
of propitiation was substitutionary and vicarious. Vicarious simply
means by term in the place of another. Substitution. Substituted instead of the other.
So what this means is that Jesus Christ literally, not hypothetically,
he literally took your punishment instead of you. every time you
kicked your little sister in the shin when he was seven and
every time you shook your fist at heaven and curse God Jesus
Christ actually paid for specific sins listen hypothetical and
I mean by that is people that perceive the death of Christ
as a blanket death of that's just thrown out there and suspended
into this orb, and that if you want it, grab it, if not, is
completely foreign to what this Bible teaches. Listen, when he
went to the cross, he went to the cross and bore sin, real
sin for real people, not hypothetical imaginary folks. He bore sin. He paid for it. And I realize that some people
think so surface level. And they're not willing to dig
into these deep doctrines because they're afraid of what they might
find. Or maybe it's just the fact that no one has been taught.
But our forefathers in Christianity, from the Apostle Paul through
the ages, have taught vicarious and substitutionary atonement.
And what I mean by that, to clarify the terms, is that when Jesus
Christ went to the cross, that he was literally and physically
punished by the wrath of God for true sins that people have
truly committed, individuals. I heard one guy say it this way,
he didn't just die for you, he died as you. We like to put on the shelf those
kinds of thoughts, but the Bible doesn't. The Bible doesn't he
didn't go to the cross for a hypothetical people and for the sins of a
possible people He actually bore the sins of a particular people
Matthew 121 he shall save his people from their sins The view
of a universal atonement of an unspecified group of people and
an unspecified group of sins is the foundation for universalism.
Universalism is that foul demonic doctrine that teaches at the
end everybody is going to get saved, that nobody goes to hell.
That's what Rob Bell turned into, who was once at one time possibly,
I don't agree with him, I've heard that he was a quasi-evangelical
preacher. And now he's on Oprah Winfrey's
show saying that nobody goes to hell. He wrote a book called
Love Wins and in that book he twists and perverts the Christian
faith into universalism and saying that when Christ went to the
cross and that he died and bore the sins of every person that
has ever lived and every sin that was ever committed and that
everybody in the end thereby and therefore is saved. You tell me how that squares
with scripture. I understand that an emotional person that
can't bear the thought of God-hating rebels that refuse and reject
the gospel of Jesus Christ going to hell, some people will not
own up to that could ever be true. A loving God could not
do so. But I'll say to you, how can
a loving God not do so? Let's go back to my story. I'm
just taking my time, I'm slowing down a bit. What about that guy that walked
out of the courthouse? What about a judge that knew
that loophole wasn't real and that dismissed those 900 and
some counts of molestation against that little girl and let that
guy walk out? Is that love? What if everybody
walks out and gets hold of your kids? Is that love? The problem is this. We want
him punished. But we don't wanna see ourselves
as sinners before God and deserving of God's wrath for our sins to
be punished. That's the problem. And I'm just like you. I see
offenses against children as the most heinous. I really do.
And I had seven years of, that's all I did, work those kinds of
crimes. And they're heinous, they're utterly heinous. But we're talking about a holy
God that hates all sin. He hates lying, says all liars
will have their part in the lake of fire in the book of Revelation.
All liars. A God that hates sin. He hates little white lies, because
there are no little white lies in God's eyes, they're all lies. And we sin against the truth
of the word of God. And I realize this is not the
most popular preaching, I probably won't make it on TV. And I don't
want to. I want us to grab hold of the
truth and embrace the truth and appreciate what Christ did on
the cross and that he actually suffered the wrath of God for
the sins that I have committed. Is there going to be a tornado? Okay, we've got time. Just for our visitors. In 1942,
prior was wiped out. And the one that in fact knocked
the only building that stood was this one, this one in the
in the PYO building down there. We this building has three foot
thick rock and concrete walls. So we're good. Next thing I want to say because
this is is I want to bring up that there was a full salvation
one that's my third point under this caption a full salvation
was one on the cross it says not only for our sins but for
those of the whole world and I really need to explain this
because it seems somewhat contradictory to what I've decided about the
atonement being vicarious, substitutionary, Christ literally taking the sins
and dying for the sins, particular sins of people, His people, Matthew
121. It seems that this text, in light
of what I've just taught, in light of what we understand now
for propitiation to be, It seems as if this text is kind of teaching
universal redemption. And that is that Christ's death
and atonement was for every person and every sin that's ever been
born. And we have to come to the grips of, is that what this
is saying? The Puritan said that this verse
is the most difficult verse to interpret in the whole sum of
scripture. If we believe propitiation to be for every
sin that's ever been sinned by any person, then universalism
is the only option that we got left. But we all know that universalism
is not true. I mean, what about the rich man
that died and went to hell? What about the road that leads to
destruction? What is that destruction? Does that mean that? What does
it mean? What does eternal damnation mean
then? And I think that we're all Theologically empty enough
to understand that not everybody's going to heaven Jesus said few
be that find it straight as the gate narrows the way that leads
To heaven eternal life Universalism is not biblical. Not everybody's
going to be saved in the end. Love is going to win, of course The universalism is not a it's
not love And so we know that can't be. We've got to go by
all of scripture, tota scriptura. Not everybody's going to be saved
in the end. So how do we look at this verse? Verse two, he
himself is a propitiation. He's our advocate. Stop right
there. John Gill made a good point.
I was reading John Gill on this. He's a Puritan Baptist in the
16th century, scholar, Hebrew and Greek expert. And he said
this, is Jesus Christ everybody's advocate? I mean, whenever we
get into heaven, we're going to see who the advocacy was effectual
for, right? I mean, is Jesus advocating for
unrepentant sinners hell bound? Are you kidding me? It says in Romans 8, who will bring
the charge against God's elect? And he's using in the very same
breath advocacy, propitiation, and we have to look at it in
that vein. Jesus is the Christian's advocate, the believer's advocate. He's also the believer's propitiation. Who's he writing to? Look at
verse one. My little children, Christians. So in what sense
is he saying it's the sins of the whole world? Let me just
explain something to you. And I realize that not everybody
researches these kinds of things. We have to reconcile these with
the whole sum of scriptures and the teaching of scripture on
what the atonement is. When you come to the word world
cosmos in the Greek, in Johanan literature, and I mean in John's
writing, that would be the gospel of John, that would be first
John, second John, third John, and the book of Revelation. He
uses the word world in a very unique way, cosmos. And it's
in reference to a large group of people. And it's used in that
way most often in his literature. And for us to believe that this
is inclusive of all people and all time, in John's eyes, is
nonsense. Absolute nonsense. Let me read
a passage out of John 12. Listen to this. Y'all remember
when Jesus healed Lazarus? You remember that the Pharisees
and the religious leaders in Jerusalem were not real happy.
Everybody was going out of the city and going to see this guy
that had been raised from the dead. It was a phenomenon. He'd be dead four
days, and now he's alive. It's a phenomenon. I mean, it's
all over Facebook. The Pharisees were not real happy
that all these people were coming out and seeing Lazarus and believing
upon Christ. They were upset. Now I want you
to notice the use of the word world, John 12, 19. So the Pharisees said to one
another, you see that you're not doing any good. Look, the
world has gone after him. Does that mean everybody in the
whole world has gone after him? Are you kidding me? Cosmos, a large sum of people. Everybody in the world hadn't
gone out after Christ because Lazarus got raised from the dead
The people in that region that knew about it a large sum of
people And so whenever we approach first John 2 2 we've got to understand
that This use of the world word world cosmos is in the same vein
of interpretation Now, let me explain another thing This is
a Jewish audience John is addressing Jewish believers. The little
children were Jewish believers. And so whenever he is approaching
the issue of the atonement, what are they thinking? They're thinking
about the economy of the day of atonement that they had been
focusing upon for generation after generation. Leviticus 16,
17. And in Leviticus 16, 17, where
it defines where God sets the standards for the day of atonement,
what does he say other than that this is for the community of
Israel? It's for Israel. And so in a
Jewish mind, whenever John is making mention that this propitiation
is for our sins, they would have understood in the mindset of
a Jew in the first century that had been celebrating Yom Kippur,
the Day of Atonement, their whole life and their dad and their
mom and their grandpa and their grandma and their great grandpa,
all the way back to the early days when God instituted the
Day of Atonement that belongs to Israel only. So now what's
happening? They're saying, no, wait a minute.
Christ went to the cross and He atoned, atoned Yom Kippur. It says right there in Leviticus
that it's just for the community of Israel. And John says, not
just for the community of Israel, but for communities all around
the world. For peoples from every tribe,
tongue, and revelation 5-9. Revelation 5.9 says that Jesus
shed his blood for peoples, for God, from every tribe, tongue,
kindred, and nation. And that's what he's saying.
Cosmos. For a Jew, it would be unthinkable
in this era for atonement to be for just everybody. Because it was just theirs. And
John was saying, oh no, no, no. Not just us. But now it's for
those who would believe. It's for the church. Believers
in the Jews, believers in the Gentiles. One of the scholars
on this is Dr. James Montgomery Boyce. I quote
him a lot on the Lord's Day in my sermons. He says this, if
John as a Jew is actually thinking of the propitiatory sacrifice
as it was practiced in Israel, particularly the Day of Atonement,
and how could he not? that it may well be of himself
and other Jews as opposed to the Gentiles that he uses the
word us or we in this phrase. The contrast would therefore
be not between Christians and the as yet unsaved world but
between those Jews and for whom Christ died and those Gentiles
for whom Christ died both of whom now make up or eventually
will make up the church. Remember Ephesians 5? What does
it say in Ephesians 5? Christ loved the what the church
and gave him up himself up for her the church voice goes on
to say according to this view what John wishes to say is that
Jesus fulfilled the pattern set by the Old Testament sacrifices
but that he did so in such a way that now Gentiles as well as
Jews are safe and that's difficult for some people it's difficult
That is exactly what this text is teaching in the context in
which it's written Who will bring a charge against
God select who will bring a charge against the church Why what do
you say because there's no sins left to prosecute Christ is their
advocacy because he paid for their sins in full on the cross
He bore them Yes yours. Yes mine There's nothing left for us to
pay for. When we sing the song Jesus painted,
all to him I owe. Sin had left a crimson stain.
He washed it white as snow. Why do we sing that song? He
paid the price I couldn't pay. He bore my sins. He paid for
them. He died in my place. Paul breaks
out into praise in Ephesians 1 6 0 to the praise of the glory
of his grace where he has made us Accepted in the blood Jews
and Gentiles believing Jews believing Gentiles Everybody okay Verse 3 let's
look at the believers assurance the believers assurance by this
we have we know that we have come to know him if we keep his
commandments and John Cotton was an early American
Puritan and he said that the Apostle John had shown in the
former verses that Christ is our advocate in propitiation
and here his little children might reason but how shall I
know that Christ is my advocate and reconciler though he is both
yet how shall I know that he is so for me in the answers hereby
we know that we know him if we keep commandments the proper question
I think that needed to be asked in this first century is a rhetorical
question and the question is this what kind of a knowledge
is in fact saving knowledge by this we know that we have come
to know him are you what kind of knowing is saving and what
kind of knowing is not so saving now I want you to remember that
The false doctrines that had crept into the early church that
was circulating largely. John is writing for this very
purpose. He's writing to the little children,
which were believers because Gnosticism was on the rise. That
was a false doctrine and foundational to Gnosticism is the supremacy
of extra biblical knowledge. The word is Gnosis, G-N-O-S-I-S. They believed the basis of their
salvation was upon they had the right kind of supreme and extra
biblical knowledge And the knock the Gnostic doctrine taught that
the way of salvation was by way of obtaining that knowledge But
it was through these mystical encounters and by these super
mystical in mystical encounters it provided for them a great
Supremacy of knowledge and that through that knowledge they were
saved but John is impressing upon them and pressing upon his
here's his audience and The biblical and the god-ordained means of
salvation and that is not the supremacy of knowledge But the
supremacy of a bloody sacrifice that was hanging on a cross outside
of the gates of jerusalem Gnosticism circumvented the cross
It circumvented the necessity of vicarious substitution it
circumvented the blood of the atonement for sin And let me
just add another note on this. Strangely enough, I spent 10
years in the charismatic church when I was a young man. And oddly
enough, I never heard one single sermon in 10 years that illuminated
my wickedness against the backdrop of the bloody cross. Not once. For 10 long years, here's what
I heard. You need a second work of grace. Through that second
work of grace. You're going to get some knowledge
and by that experience It's going to be special and unique and
that's what you need to focus on Over and again on Sunday and
Sunday night on Wednesday over and over and over and over not
the cross not my sin Not what Christ did but on my need for
the second work of grace the second baptism to give me this
special knowledge that dumb Baptists like me didn't have You want me to tell you what
it did? For 10 years, that focus never shifted. And for 10 years, I never heard
about my need for a Savior. For 10 years, I never heard what
Jesus did on the cross of Calvary. For 10 years, I never knew that
I was a brave, wretched sinner in need of mighty grace. For
10 years, all that was being taught, all that was being emphasized
was this superlative experience, this higher knowledge that I
needed. Sounds to me like Gnosticism.
Why does it sound like Gnosticism other than that it is Gnosticism? That message that I heard for
10 years, and this is just a caveat, that message that I heard for
10 years quieted and stilled and made a stillborn issue of
a sinner's need of true grace that was saving for us. The true
message of the gospel was aborted and the lie was burned. Week
after week, year after year. But here John is defining for
us the object of saving knowledge. It's not some esoteric experience. And what I mean by esoteric,
I mean some mystical encounter, some outside of me encounter
that's super spiritual and mystical and goose bumpy. John defines
the object of saving knowledge as not that experience, it's
the cross, not gnosis, but substitutionary atonement. He says blood, death. sacrifice, propitiation, substitution. That's how we're saved. It's
faith in the right object. And it's not by experiencing
goosebumps in a mystical situation. How do you know Christ savingly?
How do you define salvation? You know, the knowledge that
saves is the knowledge of what took place on that cross, the
knowledge of who we are as sinners, and it's our throwing ourselves
at His feet by His grace in repentance and in faith that His death is
in place of mine. His death is in place of mine. And that's the foundation for
Christian assurance. John Cotton goes on and says, so then it
is such a knowledge as makes us trust in him, a knowledge
that makes us fear him, a knowledge that makes us honor him, a knowledge
that makes us serve him, cleave to him, and yield obedience to
him. That's the kind of knowledge. In other words, it's a knowledge
that transforms. It's a knowledge that performs.
It's God's power. It's God's grace at work. It's faith that works. James
2, 6. Well, I didn't give her a thought, did
I? Well, Father, we're so thankful
that you are very clear to us in your word what your son has
done for us, your church, your people, the ones that you have
saved. Lord, we're so thankful, thankful
for what you've revealed. Lord, that while we were dead
in our sins, Jesus died for us. Lord, we're so thankful for these
verses, Lord, that are so powerful and effectual for us. Oh, Lord,
we just give you the praise for it. Lord, we glory in the cross.
We glory in what Christ has done. Not in ourselves, but in Christ.
Oh, Lord, we're so thankful that 2,000 years ago that our Savior
bore our sins in his body on the tree and that he died in
our place, that he bore the wrath that we deserve. And on the basis
of what Jesus Christ has done for us, Lord its salvation has
now extended us through his name and Lord we give you praise we
give you honor and we give you glory Lord I pray Lord that these
words will teach us and instruct us that we'll have a deep and
profound and mysterious appreciation for the work of the cross and
for the propitiation that Christ has made for us and we give you
the praise and the glory and Lord in our obedience is do what
you've done for us in Christ's name amen
Jesus, Our Advocate Part 2
Series Study of the Book of 1 John
| Sermon ID | 33116910190 |
| Duration | 45:53 |
| Date | |
| Category | Midweek Service |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2025 SermonAudio.