00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
Genesis chapter one and verse
one, let us now hear God's word. In the beginning, God created
the heavens and the earth. Let's pray. Heavenly Father,
we thank you for your revelation. We thank you that you have made
yourself known. And we thank you that you have made yourself
known to us personally, that we can say truly that we know
the creator, We know the maker of heaven and earth, and we can
call you our Father, which art in heaven. And so we ask, Father,
that you would help us as we pursue these studies in thinking
about you, the creator, and your creation. We ask that you would
help us to think with the wisdom of God and not the wisdom of
men. We ask that you would help us
to trust in the word of God rather than the word of man. We ask
that you'd bless these studies. And we pray these things for
your glory, Lord, in Jesus' name. Amen. In the beginning, there
was an explosion. Not an explosion like those familiar
on earth, starting out from a definite center and spreading out to engulf
more and more of the circumambient air. but an explosion which occurred
simultaneously everywhere, filling all space from the beginning,
with every particle of matter rushing apart from every other
particle." Those are the words of Steven Weinberg and his book,
The First Three Minutes, written in 1977. Steven Weinberg, who
was a theoretical physicist and a Nobel laureate in physics,
He wrote that book and that book was basically the popularization
of what is known as the Big Bang. It's the idea of how the universe
began, how everything started. How are we to think about the
origin of the universe? Who should we trust? Whose word
should we believe? You know the answers to those
questions already, so I'm just going to be reminding you of
things you are already familiar with, things you already know.
We believe the Word of God. We believe that in the beginning
God created the heavens and the earth. We are, in the midst of
our study of creation versus evolution, we're comparing scientific
theories and ideas that are prevalent out there in the world with what
the Bible says about creation. And so we're at this point in
our study now where we want to compare. We've introduced what
we're doing and why we're doing it. And now we want to engage
in a systematic comparison. We want to lay them side by side.
In other words, we want to lay the scientific theories and opinions
of men next to the word of God, compare and contrast them and
ultimately come down on the side of the scriptures of the word
of God. Now we're going to pursue four
basic areas as we do this. So these are the four areas that
we're going to go through as we compare evolutionary thought
with biblical thought, with biblical truth. And they are these, number
one, the origin of the universe. That's what we'll talk about
tonight. Number two, the origin of life. Number three, the origin
of species. And number four, the origin of
man. Those are the four things that we're going to go through
as we compare modern naturalistic scientific thought with the Bible. We begin with the origin of the
universe. Where did this world come from? What accounts for the existence
of the universe? Let's begin by considering how
science or evolutionary theory seeks to answer this question. Now, first of all, let's say
off the bat here that usually when we speak of evolution, we're
typically talking about life, about animal life, about human
life, and that sort of thing. But we are pressing this into
the area of the origin of the universe, Because that's how
it's typically done out there in the world in the world of
science it all kind of gets lumped in together and usually those
who tend to believe in Evolutionary theory in terms of life are going
to go with some non-biblical idea of the origin of the universe
it might be more accurate to call this the scientific naturalism
answer to the question and Where did the universe come from? Hopefully
you remember you say pastor. I don't remember Okay, you don't
remember so let me remind you Scientific naturalism. What is
that? That is the idea that nature
is all there is that this world that you can see and experience
with your five senses that's all there is and that's the only
legitimate way to explain anything and So the person who has bought
into scientific naturalism, they're not going to make recourse to
the Bible or anything divine They're gonna seek to explain
all things through natural processes Okay, that mindset gets applied
not only to life and creatures animals and human beings but
it also gets applied to the origin of the universe and trying to
answer that question and Number two because of that we're not
really dealing with Charles Darwin here Charles Darwin did not Seek
to answer the question of where did the universe come from? In
his book, The Origin of Species, he was dealing with what accounts
for the diversity of animal life that we see out there in the
world today. In his book, The Descent of Man,
he was concerned with answering the question, among other things,
of where did man come from? Who is man's ancestor, if you
will? He wasn't concerned with answering
the question of the origin of the universe. So here we're gonna
deal more with the heirs of Darwin or those who claim the mantle
of science today and in the recent past. Number three, the scientific
establishment offers no definitive unified answer to the question,
where did the universe come from? That's really important to understand
right off the bat. There are a number of different
theories about the origin of the universe, some of which directly
contradict one another. And all of this comes from the
supposedly objective, pure facts Enterprise of science and the
scientists who engage in it So we're not going to try to cover
all of the theories that are out there I'm gonna try to give
you the ones that would be most familiar to you that when I say
them you're like Oh, yeah, I've heard of that. I know that or
you see it on TV or in popular culture but I just want you to
understand right off the bat here that if you go to science
and and you go to scientists about the origin of the universe,
you're not gonna get one single answer. It depends on who you
go to, and it depends on their beliefs about these things. So
let me give you some examples here. How many of you have heard
of Edwin Hubble? Okay, you know the Hubble Telescope,
right? Okay, named after Edwin Hubble. Now Edwin Hubble, He is in the
line of Big Bang theory, where it comes from. Okay, Edwin Hubble
discovered what is known as redshift. Redshift is the light coming
from stars and distant galaxies. And Edwin Hubble theorized that
what was going on there was that was an indication that these
stars or these galaxies were moving, they were expanding,
and they were moving away from us. And the red light that you
could see through the powerful telescope was an indication of
that. But even Edwin Hubble said, there
are limits on how far we can go here. So listen to Mr. Hubble
and what he says in his book, The Realm of the Nebula. Quote,
the explorations of space end on a note of uncertainty. With
increasing distance from the earth, our knowledge fades and
fades rapidly. Eventually we reach the dim boundary,
the utmost limits of our telescopes. There we measure shadows and
we search among ghostly errors of measurement for landmarks
that are scarcely more substantial. End quote. Now, You say, what
does that mean? That means you're looking at
a telescope like this, and you're looking at stuff that's really,
really far away, and you're trying to draw conclusions about the
origin of the universe, don't get ahead of yourself. Don't
get too excited about your own intellect and your own mind.
You're looking at stuff that's a long way away. There could
be any number of variables out there that determines how you
see that and what's actually going on. Or let me give you one more example
here. Big Bang theory is named, you say, where did it get its
name? It got its name from someone who rejected it. The man's name
was Fred Hoyle. We'll come back to Fred Hoyle
in a little while. Fred Hoyle said, quote, the hypothesis that
all matter in the universe was created in one big bang at a
particular time in the remote past is in conflict with the
observational requirements. This Big Bang hypothesis is an
irrational process that cannot be described in scientific terms,
end quote. Now there is someone with great
pedigree in the scientific world, Fred Hoyle passed away, but in
the past, and Fred Hoyle says about Big Bang theory, bunk,
it's not true, it's not science. But yet most people today who
are scientifically minded would subscribe to Big Bang Theory.
Now, what do you get from that? Well, they can't agree amongst
themselves. And we're supposed to go with them. We're supposed
to believe them and just bow down to science and the smart
people and scientists. No, it shouldn't be that way.
Don't be intimidated by science. Don't be intimidated by scientists
or the scientific establishment. Okay, so before we continue,
we need to stop and recognize something very important. What
is the alternative to faith in scripture and the text that we
just read that begins the Bible? In the beginning, God created
the heavens and the earth. The alternative is the word of man.
That's what the alternative is. If we don't believe Genesis 1-1
as well as the rest of the Bible, and you're like, well, I can't
do that, I'm a person of science. I believe in science. I want
things to be objective. I wanna talk about facts. Okay,
well, guess what? You're gonna go out into the
world and you're gonna find all sorts of answers from all different
kinds of people, some of which don't go together and don't work
with one another. Should we trade the word of God
for the word of man? You know the answer to that,
right? I mean, think about what we're doing. If I am so in awe
of Stephen Hawking that I say, he is so smart, he knows so much,
how can I believe the Bible when here I've got Stephen Hawking?
I should go with him, right? Wrong. No, because what you're
doing is you're accepting the Word the speculations, the opinions
of a mere man rather than the revelation of God. So what's
at stake here in what we believe is whether we believe God's word
or we believe man's word. All right, so let's talk about
some of these theories. I'm gonna give you two basic ones. The
first theory, the first way of thinking about the origin of
the universe is that it is eternal. It's always been there. From
the ancient Greeks to modern thinkers, this has been a popular
take on the universe. Now, strictly speaking, this
isn't an origin theory because there was no origin. The universe
has always been there. Matter has always been there.
It's just eternal. It's just the way it has always
been. And so you get that in the ancient
Greeks, somebody like Aristotle. to modern day people. Like, for
example, Carl Sagan. You guys know Carl Sagan? Anybody
watch the television series, I think it was in the 1970s,
Cosmos? Carl Sagan's series about where
did all this come from? And how should we think about
all these things? Well, this is what Carl Sagan says, and
I believe this was the initial episode of the television program. Quote, the cosmos is all that
is or ever was or ever will be, end quote. What is that? That's the idea of matter or
the cosmos, the universe being eternal. Also in modern times, you've
got Fred Hoyle. I mentioned Fred Hoyle a few
moments ago. He was a British astronomer. He died in 2001,
and he was a proponent of what is known as steady state theory. What is steady state theory?
Well, it's basically that the universe is eternal, it's always
been there, and it's constantly producing what it needs to function. Where's that coming from? It's
just coming out of nowhere. It's being produced out of nowhere,
out of thin air, if you will. That was Fred Hoyle's idea. All
right, so that's one viewpoint, the universe is eternal. The
other viewpoint, the second theory that we want to consider here,
is the so-called Big Bang Theory. How many of you have heard of
Big Bang Theory? Okay, yeah, pretty much everybody here. This
is the direct opposite of the theory we just considered, that
matter, the universe, is eternal. This theory, It's really complicated
when you get into the details of it, but on its basic level. It's pretty simple Here's the
idea the idea is That at some point in the distant past they
would say billions of years ago There was some sort of reaction
temperature elements that blew the universe into existence and
The universe has kind of been expanding ever since that time. And that is the beginning of
all things. That is the origin of the universe,
this big bang, this kind of explosion, if you will. You say, where did
they get that from? Well, it goes back to Edwin Hubble.
So remember Edwin Hubble, he's looking through his telescope
and he sees this red light from distant galaxies and He comes
to the conclusion that that indicates that these galaxies are moving,
that they are moving away from us. And thus the conclusion was
made that the universe is expanding. Which if you draw it back in
and you put that in reverse, what that means is at some point,
if the universe is expanding today, or in a process of expanding,
at some point it was like this, right? it was at this point that
they call a singularity, which is a way of saying we don't know
what it is. You got this singularity in the
beginning, this heat, these elements, and bang, then it comes into
being and spreads out from there. Now that is the Nick C. Smiley $1.50 explanation of Big
Bang Theory. You can get a lot more complicated
than that, Hopefully that gives you a basic idea of where they're
getting the idea from. Okay, so this is very popular,
and this is one of the primary views of where the universe came
from. What is its origin? Now, many scientific people talk
about the problem of the universe's origin. It's a problem they're
trying to solve. It's an issue, it's a knot that
they're trying to untie. So, for example, Steven Weinberg
that I mentioned a few minutes ago, he says in his book, The
First Three Minutes, quote, the urge to trace the history of
the universe back to its beginnings is irresistible. From the start
of modern science in the 16th and 17th centuries, physicists
and astronomers have returned again and again to the problem
of the origin of the universe, end quote. Let's stop and ask
a question, why is it a problem? Why is the origin of the universe
a problem? It's only a problem when you reject this. When you
say, no, no, no, no, that's too simple. No, that's who knows
where Genesis came from. We don't believe in inspiration.
That's just a human book. We reject all of that. But now
they've got a problem that has to be solved. Why? Because they've
rejected God. They've rejected his word. But
for us, we don't have a problem, do we? The origin of the universe
is not a problem that Christians are desperately trying to solve.
Why? Because we believe Genesis 1-1.
We accept that God's word is true and trustworthy. And so
we don't have a problem at all. So they may be staying up late
at night trying to figure it out. And we say, you're wasting
your time. You ought to believe the Bible
and go to bed. It's not a problem. All right,
so much then for the evolutionary view on the origin of the universe.
Now let's turn to the real deal, to the scriptures for the answer
to the question, where did the universe come from? All right,
we're here in Genesis 1 and verse 1. First of all, let's talk about
the what. In the beginning, God created
the heavens and the earth. The heavens and the earth is
a Hebrew way of saying everything. So if you want to talk about
the entirety of the universe, you put it all together in this
phrase, the heavens and the earth. It's not a way of saying, well,
God created the sky and he created the earth, but nothing else.
No, it's a way of including everything. It would kind of like us saying,
it would be something like we saying head to toe, right? You're
including everything in between when you say that. So the heavens
and the earth, this is the biblical way to refer to the universe
that God created the universe in the very beginning. Of course,
who did it? Well, the Big Bang didn't do it. Really intense
heat didn't do it Chemicals and elements didn't do it who did
it God did it in the beginning God? Now if you caught it that
opening In the opening of the message tonight. I read you that
portion from the gentleman's book and you caught his His using
the language of Genesis 1, in the beginning, there was an explosion.
Well, we say in the beginning, God created the heavens and the
earth. That's what accounts for the
universe, a person, the divine person. That's where we get the
universe from. It comes from God who is its
maker. Number three, when did it occur?
Well, that's answered in the opening three words. The verse
in the beginning you say well pastor Nick, that's really simple.
I could have stayed home tonight. I Knew that in the beginning
God created the heavens of the earth. Why is that important?
It's important because it indicates that the universe is not eternal
matter Stuff is not eternal There was a particular point in time
That God created the universe the heavens and the earth He
created everything out of nothing, and He did so at a particular
time. The universe is not eternal.
Who is eternal? The Creator is, right? God is. Psalm 90 verse 2, before the
mountains were brought forth, wherever you had formed the earth
and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, you are God. It's not the universe that's
eternal, it's God. The universe has not always been
there, it was created in the beginning. Number four, how did
the universe come into being? What means did God use to bring
it into existence? Now, we've been through Genesis
chapter one, and we noted all along the way the means by which
God created all things. How does he do it? Verse 3, then
God, what? Said, let there be light. And there was light. Verse 6,
then God said, let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters. Verse
9, then God said, Let the waters into the heavens
be gathered together into one place. You get the idea. That
gets repeated over and over again throughout the first chapter
of Genesis. How did God do it? God did it through his word.
Should we accept a theory that omits and ignores that? and instead
substitutes in its place heat, chemicals, elements, hydrogen,
all that sort of thing? No, we should not. Now, did God
make hydrogen and carbon and all of those things? Of course
He did. He brought those things into existence. But He did so
through His mighty, awesome word. That's what the Bible teaches
us. I'm gonna read you a few other statements of scripture
about that. Psalm 33, by the word of the Lord, the heavens
were made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.
Let all the earth fear the Lord. Let all the inhabitants of the
world stand in awe of him. That's what we are meant to do.
Not stand in awe of some scientific theory, but stand in awe of the
maker, the creator who brought all things into existence. Why
should we stand in awe of him? The psalmist continues, for he
spoke, And it was done. He commanded and it stood fast. I mean that when you look, when
you read Genesis chapter one and you read of the awesome power
of God, I mean, just think about it. God speaks and a universe
comes into existence. Sun, moon, stars. Animal life
all of these things that we read about in Genesis chapter 1 we
are meant to honor God for his powerful word We're meant to
worship God Rather than come up with some substitute for that
Whatever substitute you pick if you're tempted to get a substitute
it will always be inferior to God and his creative word Finally,
Hebrews 11.3 says, by faith we understand that the worlds were
framed by what? By the word of God. So it wasn't chemicals reacting
to one another, nor is it some kind of primordial singularity.
You say, Pastor, I don't know what that is. Don't worry about
it. Just know God spoke and it happened. He uttered his mighty
voice and things came into being. All right, so we've compared
the two. We've compared some of the world's theories about
the origin of the universe with the Bible. I hope you can see
they're different. Right? Now, somebody wants to
say at this point, yeah, but couldn't have God done the Big
Bang? Well, the problem with the Big
Bang, there's more than one problem with the Big Bang. But if you
go to the scientists and say, explain to me the Big Bang, is
he gonna talk about God? Is he gonna reference Holy Scripture?
Now you might find some Christian man who tries to put the two
together, but more often than not, you're not gonna get that.
So they're different, I believe. And one is superior. One is objectively
superior, and that's the Bible. The Bible's account of the origin
of the universe is obviously superior. You say, Pastor Nick,
you're biased. Yes, I'm afraid I am. But when you have eyes
to see it, when your eyes are open, you can't help but say,
this is so much better. This is so much greater. This
is so much more awesome. Awesome, all-powerful, omnipotent
God speaks and things come into existence. Would you rather have
that or would you rather have chemicals reacting to one another?
Boom. I hope you know the answer. Furthermore,
in the Bible's teaching on the origin of the universe, we have
divine purpose rather than chance. In Big Bang theory, for example,
the universe comes into existence for no particular reason at all.
Why did the chemicals react? Why was it so hot? What was it
that caused the explosion? You know what their answers are?
They don't have any answers to that. They cannot answer the
why question. Why is it that a particular point
in time this supposed reaction occurred and the universe was
flung into existence? Tell me why they can't answer
that question, but we can. We have the answer. It's right
here in the Bible. Where did all this come from?
It came from God and his creative word. God created these things. We can answer the why question.
God spoke things, all things into being and for a glorious
and wonderful purpose. Big Bang theory we're just living
in the Big Bangs world of chemicals and elements and reactions and
all that sort of thing in the Bible We're living in God's world
who has a purpose Who has a plan for things and he creates the
world not? Randomly, it's not a result of
chance. It's the result of divine purpose
In addition to that Which model the world and whatever scientific
model they want to give us can really lay claim to be supported
by the evidence. Now, if you got some really smart
person, let's say we got a hold of the top scientist of today
who subscribes to Big Bang Theory. He could probably talk you in
circles. talking about radio waves and
electromagnetic whatnots, heat and expansion of the universe,
and all that sort of thing, and it can dazzle you for a minute,
but then you just, you gotta put the brakes on. You gotta
put the brakes on and say, hang on just a minute. Let me get
this straight what you're telling me is for no apparent reason
at all The universe exploded into existence and it just so
happens that the Sun got to the precise place where it needed
to be to facilitate life on earth and It just so happens that the
moon is in the precise position that it needs to be in To function
in the way that is good for the world How did that happen? If the Big Bang is the answer,
then why are these things just not flying wildly and chaotically
all over the place? Why are planets going in an orbit,
an orderly orbit around the sun? Why are moons orbiting around
planets in a regular pattern? How did we get that from the
Big Bang? How do you explain that? I don't believe they can. Now, what we have to open our
eyes to and be prepared for is lots of fancy sounding stuff
that doesn't get to the point. All right, look around you tonight.
You've got paintings on the walls over there and over there, curtains
hanging, light fixtures. You walk into a room like this,
and what do you think? Does any rational human being
step into a room like this one and say, wow, all of this exploded
into its precise place, exactly where it needed to be? No, nobody
does that. Why? Because they recognize somebody
arranged this. Somebody did this. Let's take
the picture on the wall over there, for example. Now let's
say you ask Mr. Smarty Pants to explain, how
is it that that painting got over there? Talk to me about
that painting. Well, he might say, well, you
see, there's a nail behind that wall, and that nail has load-bearing
capacity. It has the ability, because of
its strength, because of its chemical makeup, to keep that
painting up on the wall. And he might talk that way for
some time, and at some point, you need to stop and ask him
the question, yeah, but how did it get there? How did that painting
get in that precise spot? That sure looks like intelligent
design. That sure looks like an intelligent
agent, a human being, put that together and put it in its proper
place. Well, the world is like that,
is it not? It bears the marks of the divine
designer in so many different ways. And we've seen this before
but let's look at it one more time. Let's go from Genesis 1
to Romans chapter 1. Romans chapter 1. And here again we want to look
at what the Bible says about the evidence for God in creation. Romans chapter 1 beginning at
verse 18, for the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against
all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth
in unrighteousness. Because what may be known of
God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. Here
we go, verse 20. For since the creation of the
world, His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood
by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead,
so that they are without excuse. We've talked about it many times,
but let's just underscore the point again. When you go out
into the world, the world bears the fingerprints of its maker.
There is ample and abundant evidence of design. Again, just think
about the solar system. What's keeping the sun there?
If the universe is expanding, what's keeping the sun in its
place? What's keeping the moon where it needs to be? What's
causing all these orbits? All of that exhibits the signs
of design that we have that support what scripture says about God. How can you see God? Well, he's
invisible, but you can see his handiwork. The invisible God
is visible in the things he has made and the things that he has
created in such a way as the end of verse 20 says, so that
they are without excuse. You have to close your eyes to
the evidence all around you for a creative designer, a divine
designer. Now let's conclude tonight with
a couple of thoughts about this, additional thoughts about this.
Is the origin of the universe a question for science? We should
ask that. Can science Answer the question. Where did the universe come from?
remember our introduction to scripture and science We talked
about what science is science is the pursuit of knowledge and
it is related to the scientific method. What's the scientific
method? the scientific method goes back to Francis Bacon and
And it's the idea that man is to go out into the world, and
he is to use his reason, he's to use his senses, interact with
that world, and he's to follow a particular method to arrive
at a place of knowledge about how things work in the world.
How do you do that? You collect data, you form a
hypothesis, you perform experiments to test that hypothesis, and
you're supposed to ensure that your results are repeatable,
that others can conduct the same experiments and expect to get
the same results. Are scientists able to do that
with the origin of the universe? No, they can't. No one has the
origin of the universe in a laboratory. Nor is it possible for them to
put it in a laboratory and examine it under the microscope. So a
very subtle shift is made that you have to watch for. What is
that subtle shift? Now we're no longer strictly
talking about the scientific method. What we're talking about
is the scientist is looking at the way things work today, and
he's extrapolating backwards. He's saying, I see this, I see
this, I think I know how this works, and now I'm gonna do this
in reverse. Let's say, this must be the explanation
for how things worked at the beginning of the world, but we
must hit the pause button and say, how do you know that? And that's the question that
doesn't often get asked or answered. And what you'll find underneath
that is assumptions. One of those assumptions is what
I see today and how I see things working today, that's how it
worked back then. And so that's why I'm gonna come to this particular
conclusion. But it's one thing to observe
how things are currently working and form a hypothesis. It's another
thing to apply that to the beginning of the universe. Science cannot
answer the question of the origin of the universe. It thinks it
can, but it can't. Stephen Hawking put it this way,
quote, questions about our origins were once regarded as the territory
of philosophers and theologians. He's right about that. But gradually
the answers have been provided by science. Speculations have been replaced
by hard facts. Hmm, wonder who was doing the
speculating there. Especially in the last few decades.
We have made remarkable progress in understanding the genesis
and evolution of the universe end quote Sounds pretty confident,
doesn't he? Yep Well to state the obvious
there was only one person there in the beginning and it was God
and Therefore he's the only one competent to tell us how it all
went down how it took place and You say, well, that will require
revelation. Yeah, exactly. God has to tell
us how he did it, when he did it, and how it all worked. You
say, is that what the Bible is? Yes, that's what the Bible is.
It's divine revelation. It's God disclosing, revealing
how he created the universe, how he brought all things into
existence. God was the only one there, and
he has told us about it in his word. Finally, one more thing,
and for this let's go to Hebrews, Hebrews chapter 11. This is the
passage that we heard in the scripture reading tonight. Hebrews chapter 11 and verse
3. It's vital that we understand
that the question of the origin of the universe is, in the final
analysis, a matter of faith. This is true for creationists,
for those who believe the Bible, as well as evolutionists. None
of us was there. It cannot be recreated in the
laboratory. We must believe something. because
we trust the word of someone. Who will it be? Hebrews 11, three. By faith, we understand that
the worlds were framed by the word of God. How do we understand
it? We understand it by faith. What
does that mean? That means we trust God and we
trust his word. And that's how we come to the
conclusion that the worlds were framed by his word. So the choice is, will you put
your trust in men or will you put your trust in God? It is
really that stark. Will we trust the supposed wisdom
and learning of scientific people or will we trust the written
revelation of God in the Bible? What a sad thing it would be for someone to put their faith
in Stephen Hawking or Fred Hoyle or anybody, any
man for that matter, and then realize at some point in eternity,
oh, what have I done? I put my trust in men. We must
not do that. For us, the choice is clear.
We must believe God and his word. And it's by faith that we understand
that. You gotta believe somebody. You gotta trust the word of somebody.
You're gonna have faith in somebody. Will it be them? Will it be the
scientists? Will it be the scientific establishment? Or will it be
God and his word? Let's close with this quote from
Robert Jastrow. Robert Jastrow was an American
astronomer He died in 2008. And I think this is just funny. This is just a humorous place
to end our study tonight, okay? So I'll send you out with a smile
on your face. This is from his book entitled, God and the Astronomers. Quote, now this man wasn't a
Christian, okay? Quote, now we would like to pursue
that inquiry further back in time, But the barrier to further
progress seems insurmountable. It is not a matter of another
year, another decade of work, another measurement, or another
theory. At this moment, it seems as though
science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery
of creation. For the scientist who has lived
by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a
bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of
ignorance. He is about to conquer the highest
peak. As he pulls himself over the
final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have
been sitting there for centuries. Let's pray. Heavenly Father,
we thank you for your word tonight. Oh, Father, it really does come
down to whether we trust you or not. it really does come down
to who we're gonna believe, where our faith will be placed. Sometimes
we get confused by intellectual, fancy-sounding language, and
we forget to sort through all of that, get underneath the surface,
and look at what's really going on. This matter of where the
universe came from is really, in the end, it's a matter of
the word of man versus the word of God. And so we ask, Father,
that you would help us to trust you. Help us to trust your word. Help us not to be embarrassed,
to trust the Bible and what it teaches and what it says. Help
us not to seek to modify it, to fit with what men say it must
say, but help us to accept it as it is, to interpret it rightly,
and most of all, Father, to stand in awe of you, as our creator,
as the one who brought all of this into existence, how we ought
to worship you, how we ought to bow down before you and tremble
in your presence, tremble at the power of your word. Lord,
help us to do that. Help the pursuit of answering
the question, where did the universe come from, lead us to the place
of worship. Worship of you, our creator. We thank you for this day that
you've given us, Lord. Thank you for the blessings of
being with your people and worshiping you and hearing your word. We
pray that you would bless what we have heard today, make it
fruitful in our hearts and lives in this coming week. We pray
in Jesus' name. Amen. Thank you so much for being here
tonight. Please receive the Lord's blessing as you leave. The grace
of the Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
Creation vs. Evolution II
Series Studies in Genesis
| Sermon ID | 212241535134198 |
| Duration | 44:39 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday - PM |
| Bible Text | Genesis 1:1; Hebrews 11:3 |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.
