00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
Grace and peace to you, church.
Good to see you. If you would, turn in your Bibles to 2 Timothy
chapter 3. Had a bit of a scheduling error,
and we won't be in Jude this morning. So hopefully this will
be an extenuation, a highlight of the Bible study over the last
couple of weeks. Probably won't say anything clearer
than has been said, but probably a lot louder. 2 Timothy 3, we're gonna be looking
at verses 14 through 17. As we've been considering the
doctrine of sola scriptura, there's many things up under that doctrine,
the inerrancy of Scripture, the infallibility of Scripture, the
veracity of Scripture. So we're gonna be looking at
the sufficiency of Scripture this morning, the sufficiency
of Scripture. So if you would, bow your heads with me and let's
pray together as we enter in this time of worship over God's
Word. Great God in heaven, truth itself,
you are true and you are truth. We have nowhere else to go, oh
Lord, for the guidance of our souls, for the renewing of our
minds, for the hope that we need so desperately to see through
the fog of this earth and its struggles and its cares. Where
will we go, oh Lord? Apart from you and your word,
where will we find the truth? We ask now, Lord, that you would
please grant us strength by the Holy Spirit to hear and understand
and grant the preacher strength, Lord. He is in weakness and fear
and trembling. I ask, Lord, that you would sanctify
this moment for the glory of Christ. In his name we pray,
amen. Well, the church to whom the
transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted does
not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the
holy scriptures alone. Are your antennas going up? Both
scripture and tradition must be accepted and honored with
equal sentiments of devotion and reverence. So states the
catechism of the Roman Catholic Church. As we're now some 500
years after the events of the Protestant Reformation, we are
no less removed from the importance of the truths embedded in that
movement. One of the well-known doctrines at the core of the
Reformation, the divide really between Protestants and Catholics,
is the issue of justification. How a man is made right with
God. Is he justified by faith plus works, or is he justified
by faith alone? The other doctrinal issue at
the core of the divide was the issue of authority. Is the scripture
entirely and exclusively authoritative in the life of the church and
the life of the believer? Is it the only source and norm
of the Christian faith? In other words, is it sufficient? Rome says no, and we beg to differ. The subject before us this morning
is one of authority, and as we deal with the question of authority,
we're more specifically dealing with that great Reformation truth
of the sufficiency of Scripture. It is authoritative, but is it
the only authority? Is the Bible alone sufficient
for the church, for you? Does it alone contain all things
necessary for God's glory, man's salvation, faith, and life, as
our own confession would say? Or are the Catholics right? More
closely, maybe to our own context, are the Charismatics right? The popularity of a recent devotional
book by Sarah Young called Jesus Calling probably presses this
truth a little closer to home for us. It's a wildly popular
devotional book over the last couple of years. It's sold millions
and millions of copies. I want to quote from Sarah Young's
book for you. Sarah says this, the following
year, I began to wonder if I too could receive messages during
my times communing with God. I had been writing in prayer
journals for years, but that was one-way communication. I did all the talking. I knew
that God communicated with me through the Bible, but I yearned
for something more. There's the key underline. Increasingly,
she goes on to say, I wanted to hear what God had to say to
me personally on a given day. I decided to listen to God with
pen in hand, writing down whatever I believed he was saying. It
felt awkward at first, she says, but I received a message. Scripture
was not enough for Sarah Young. and it's not enough for millions
upon millions of professing Christians. This book, again, is extremely
popular as a devotional, sold millions of copies. The popularity
of the book tells me a lot about what our Christian culture believes
practically. We can say inerrancy, infallibility,
sign our name to the Chicago Statement, But practically, many
of us are just like Sarah Young. We want to hear from God on the
daily and have a two-way communication. I've often said kind of tongue-in-cheek,
if you want to hear God audibly, read your Bible out loud. If there's a place for unwritten
tradition in Rome, or more closely again to our context, unwritten
verbal revelation in the form of tongues and prophecy, binding
on a believer's conscience, then can we truly say the Bible alone
is enough? Can we claim it to be entirely
and exclusively authoritative? So our subject is a sobering
subject, beloved. We can't revisit this enough. I don't feel bad about kind of
piggybacking on Brandon's Bible studies, although he's doing
a great job. I'm not gonna offer anything
substantially different. But this subject can't be reiterated
enough. It can't become boring to us. We can't make any mistakes
here. We have to be very, very careful. Tinkering with the authority
and sufficiency of Scripture fundamentally redefines the voice
and rule of God in our lives and in the church. In a word,
it's an attack on the very throne of God. We are playing with fire. Exhibit A, Nadab and Abihu. The Apostle John closes the canon
of Scripture with these words, quote, I warn everyone who hears
the words of the prophecy of this book. If anyone adds to
them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. You would think that's enough
of a warning. Solemn words and a very stern warning for us,
and we have to feel the weight of our subject. Now, one of the
premier passages in Holy Scripture that give us a clear picture
of these issues is 2 Timothy 3. It's kind of the locus classicus,
really, of this subject. So Paul, writing to young Pastor
Timothy, says this, beginning in verse 14. 2 Timothy 3, 14. But as for you, continue in what
you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you
learned it, and how from childhood you have been acquainted with
the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation
through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is breathed out
by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction,
for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete,
equipped for every good work. We'll handle our text, if you
have an outline, in three points. First, I want you to see that
Scripture alone is all-sufficient for all the wisdom necessary
for salvation. Scripture alone is all-sufficient
for the wisdom necessary for salvation. Second, Scripture
alone is all-sufficient in its rule of life for the believer. And third, Scripture is sufficient,
all-sufficient, to make the man of God complete and equipped
for every good work. So a little bit of a background
to this text. Paul's writing from a Roman prison.
He's awaiting execution. He's writing to a young pastor
who is ministering in Ephesus at the time. Scholars believe
that the timing of this epistle proves it to be Paul's last.
These are in another way to say, these are the last words of a
dying man. In the letter, we pick up on the fact that Paul
knew his death was very near. In chapter four, he says, for
I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the
time of my departure has come. What would the aged apostle say
to a young minister? What would be his last words? Among many other things stated
in the letter, Paul gives Timothy an apostolic charge regarding
Timothy's responsibilities to pastor the flock of God. Paul
himself had faced many trials and he exhibited courage among
all of them. He knew that what would happen
after his death, he knew that false teachers would come in
and lead people into increasing ungodliness, upsetting the faith
of some with lies. Many, he says, would have the
appearance of godliness but deny its power. They would creep into
households and they would capture the weak. They would oppose the
truth, going on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived,
not continuing in the Scriptures. This chapter of Scripture, if
you look at chapter three, it's bookended by false teachers on
the one hand, you see that in the first nine verses, and people
with itching ears on the other hand, who will gather for themselves
teachers to suit their own passions. You can see that at the beginning
of chapter four. And there was Timothy stuck in
the middle with the weight of a shepherd's responsibilities
and the purity of the church at stake. What could be the bedrock
upon which Timothy would stand? Well, just as we begin to unfold
this text, I want to give you two preliminary remarks. They're not on your outline,
but two preliminary remarks from verse 14 and verse 15. Preliminary
remark number one, Paul begins by saying in verse 14, as for
you, continue. He says this in direct contrast
to the false teachers of the day, in contrast to the false
teachers who are supposedly progressing on, always wanting something
new and hearing something new, yet ultimately falling. Paul tells Timothy to continue
or to remain, he says, Stay in this certain fixed sphere or
domain. And where's Timothy to abide?
It says in verse 14, continue in what you have learned and
have firmly believed. Continue in what you have learned
and firmly believed. This is later explained by the
explicit statements in verse 15 and 16 as the sacred writings. Continue in the sacred writings
and continue in all scripture. So Timothy is charged by Paul
to continue in that body of doctrine contained in the Holy Scripture.
Seeing the time of his departure was at hand and that he was already
being poured out as a drink offering, Paul, that one who had finished
the race well and kept the faith, now urges his disciple to do
the same. He urges him to remain within
the bounds of what he has learned and has firmly believed. And he says, also, recollect
from whom you learned these things, knowing from whom you learned
it. There's a saying that the hand
that rocks the cradle rules the world. You've heard that phrase
before, the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. It's
meant to convey the deeply significant role a mother plays in shaping
the world around us. In Timothy's case, I think we
could kind of tweak that and rework it a little bit. And we
could say something like this, the hand that rocks the cradle
rules the church. The hand that rocks the cradle
rules the church. Timothy was raised with a godly
heritage, which Paul used to remind him of the sincere faith
that lived in his grandmother Lois and his mother Eunice. This
heritage served as a foundational element for Timothy's ministry.
It was from childhood through his mother and his grandmother,
but especially through the apostolic authority of Paul, that Timothy
learned the faith. The apostle was telling Timothy
to continue in what he had learned and firmly believed, to recall
it to mind, to remain in those things. But let's not lose the
point. Paul's appeal to Timothy was
an appeal to Scripture alone. He was not appealing to tradition.
He was not appealing to new revelation. He was saying, Timothy, you've
learned it from the Scripture. You've heard it from your grandmother.
You've heard it from your mother. You've heard it from me. There
is substantially nothing different about what I've told you than
what's been written before. Stay in the Scriptures. This brings us to a preliminary
second point, verse 15. Verse 15 clarifies the previous
point by mentioning the sacred writings, and we learn much about
that in Bible study. It's a phrase only used once
in the New Testament. It's directly connected to the source of the
writings. Sacred writings means they are
God's writings. They are from God himself. They're not just simply writings,
but they are the sacred writings. And these things, Timothy's grandmother
and mother, and even Timothy himself, were acquainted with.
They walked with them. They talked with them. They were
constant companions of the scriptures. They talked to them when they
sat in their house, when they walked by the way, when they
lay down, when they rose. They bound them to their life.
And Timothy, along with his family, were those who ultimately hoped
in the Messiah to come. That's what the Old Testament
was pointing to. That's the end and goal of the
entire Old Testament, to point to Christ. Scripture, and in
context here, the Old Testament was life for them. One theologian
says this, Timothy had learned the doctrines of Christianity
from his grandmother and mother and the genuine apostle. And
as Christianity is founded on the law and the prophets, Timothy
was able to compare its doctrines with all that had been typified
and predicted, and consequently was assured that the Christian
religion was true. He came to faith in Christ through
the Old Testament. So those are the two preliminary
remarks to kind of speed us up to this more main point that
I want to get to here on the sufficiency of Scripture. So
that brings us to our first point. Scripture alone is all sufficient
for the wisdom necessary for salvation, verse 15. This is
plain. in the rest of verse 15, he says,
how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings
which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in
Christ Jesus. So in context, Paul's not referring
to, I don't think he's referring to salvation in the initial sense,
being born again. repentance, and faith. Though
Scripture is clear that our initial salvation is through the incorruptible
seed of the Word of God, 1 Peter 1.23, and though it's certain
that apart from Scripture, men are not wise in and of themselves
for salvation. Paul's speaking to Timothy as
a pastor. As a man who has already possessed
eternal life, he has it in his possession. So Paul's aim in
this statement was much broader and more encompassing than that
initial moment of salvation. Salvation here carries with it
the idea of the future goal of salvation, that final day of
deliverance and every step in between. Paul's referring to
that final day of salvation. Not only must Timothy learn or
lean on the sacred writings, but he must also use them to
lead others to that same possession of that final salvation, which
is the Christian's future hope of glory. Peter says something
similar in 1 Peter 2. He says, like newborn infants,
long for the pure spiritual milk that by it you may grow up into
salvation. He's not talking about being
born again there, but maturity in Christ for that final day
when we see him face to face. The sacred writings alone possess
the ability to make the believer wise for salvation, both initially
and for that great day. And notice too in verse 15, it's
for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. The goal of the
Old Testament scriptures was not for a cold and bare adherence
to the letter of the law. It was for salvation through
faith in Christ. That's their design, that's the sum of all
the teaching in the Old Testament. So as modern men might say, to
unhitch yourself from it, how could you? You would never arrive
at Christ without it. That's the sum and substance
of everything God wrote in the Old Testament. Jesus says this
in Luke 24, oh foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe
all the prophets have spoken. Was it not necessary that the
Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?" And
what does he do? Not beginning with Matthew or
Mark or Luke, hadn't even been written. Beginning with Moses
and the prophets, he interpreted to them in all the scriptures
the things concerning himself. So scripture alone is all sufficient
for the wisdom necessary for salvation. You need not look
anywhere else for your life in Christ. Number two. Scripture
alone is the all-sufficient guide for the believer's life. Scripture
alone is the all-sufficient guide for the believer's life. So moving
from a more general statement regarding the sufficiency of
Scripture, Paul now commends its sufficiency on account of
its authority. He expounds on and expands on
what he just mentioned by the sacred writings in a much more
specific and formal way. He kind of crystallizes what
he means here. And the apostle says in verse
16, all scripture is theopneustos. Theopneustos. If you were here
at the Bible study, you know what that means. It's a compound
of two words, theos and pneuma. It's God and breath. God and
breath. Scripture is breathed out by
God. The utter uniqueness and sufficiency
of Scripture forced Paul really, and he does this a lot in the
New Testament, it forced Paul to compound two words together
to make a completely unique Greek word. Theopneustasis is nowhere
else in the Greek corpus. It's a totally unique neologism,
as some people say. It's a new word. This word of
God is theopneustos. Paul strains to encapsulate this
idea, so he comes up with this brand new word. It's God-breathed. Hermann Bavink says this about
the inspiration of Scripture, the God-breathed Scripture. He
says, by inspiration, Scripture is kept alive and made efficacious. That means it has work to do.
It's effective. our lives. It's ever-living and
eternally youthful in a word, an ever-ongoing speech to God
from God to us. It's the abiding report between
heaven and earth, the living voice of God, the letter of the
omnipotent God to his creature. Not only was scripture God-breathed
at the moment it was written down, it is God-breathing. Wasn't just God breathed when
Paul wrote it, it is God breathing right now to you through a donkey
up here. All scripture has God-breathed
character. It's ever-living, Bavinck says,
eternally youthful. It never gets old and stale. It's ever-ongoing, abiding. a living voice, a letter of omnipotent
power from God to his creature. Not only was it God-breathed,
it is God-breathing. It is theopneustos to you. Notice also that it is not some
scripture or even the certain scriptures. This was highlighted
in the Bible study in a very clear way. It is all scripture
that has God-breathed character. Every single word, verbal, plenary
inspiration. It's the entire corpus of the
sacred writings, those things that Timothy knew well from childhood. And it also incorporates those
things that had already been inscripturated by the apostles,
and by extension, those writings that would be inscripturated
by them in a later time. John Calvin offers some clarifying
words here. He says this, so far as relates
to the substance of the Old Testament scripture, nothing has been added. As we look at the New Testament,
as far as the substance of the Old Testament goes, there's nothing
substantially different in the Old Testament than is in the
New. Nothing has been added, he says, for the writings of
the apostles contain nothing else than a simple and natural
explanation of the law and the prophets, together with a manifestation
of the things expressed in them. I think it was Augustine, I believe
this can be attributed to him, but Augustine who said, the new
is in the old concealed, and the old is in the new revealed. Everything contained in the Old
Testament has now blossomed and come to its final and full fruition
in the New Testament. So Paul then gives Timothy in
verse 16 what we might label a body of doctrinal and practical
divinity in four simple words. Here's where he crystallizes
all Scripture. What does it mean that all Scripture
is breathed out by God? Why is it sufficient for us? The Apostle says, these four
things encompass the entirety of the purpose of divine revelation.
Wrapped up in these four terms, we are instructed regarding really
what we could call a fourfold purpose of the Bible, of divine
revelation. First, it is all sufficient for
teaching. You see there in verse 16, all
Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching. Scripture is profitable for teaching.
That is, it's profitable for doctrinal instruction, for the
discovery, for the illustrating, for the confirming of those things
about God and man and Christ and salvation and the future
world. It teaches us about our heavenly
home and what we ought to expect. Paul instructed Timothy that
until he returned, Timothy was to devote himself to the public
reading of Scripture, exhortation, and teaching. that he must keep
guard over that teaching. And teachings mentioned first
here among those things, before all the other things, Calvin
says, it would be of no purpose that you exhort or approve someone
if you've not previously instructed them. Well, duh, thank you, Calvin. It's very clear. Scripture alone
is sufficient for teaching a true knowledge of God and for understanding
the will of God. Second, it's all sufficient for
reproof, for reproof. It's meant for the formal testing
of someone who may be in error or in heresy. In English, that
word reproof or rebuke means quite literally to beat down,
not literally with a stick or something, but to beat down the
argument. Among the works of the flesh mentioned in Galatians
5, we see that word factions. Behind that word is the Greek
word heresis, where we get the English word heresy. A faction
marked out groups or individuals making intentional, divisive
choices in light of or apart from the established teaching
of scripture. We've seen a lot of this in Jude
as we've covered that book. These false apostles or these
false teachers were constantly trying to bring in something
new, bringing in a new teaching. Scripture is all sufficient for
reproof. Here's what that means for us
ground level. There is absolutely no error or no heresy the world,
past, present, or future, that the Scripture cannot effectively
dismantle and defeat. There's nothing you under the
sun. There's no error or heresy in the world that Holy Scripture
cannot defeat. Think of it, the Judaizers in
all their heresy fell at the authoritative Word of God. Gnosticism,
Montanism, Marcionism, Dacitism, Sabellianism, Arianism, Pelagianism,
Wokeism, and every other ism, all are dealt a death blow at
the hand of Holy Scripture. As the old hymn goes, what more
can he say than to you he has said? I really do wonder how
our reformed charismatic brothers can sing that with any ounce
of gusto. What more can he say? They're
all there to hear something brand new. Scripture alone is all sufficient
for addressing and guarding against error and heresy. It's all sufficient,
third, for correction. You can see that in verse 16. It's sufficient for building
back what has been previously destroyed or restoring what has
become dilapidated by sin. Holy Scripture alone sets in
place our spiritual bones when they're out of joint. It fortifies
what's weak. It corrects all false notions.
It clears up mistaken views. One theologian says of the correction
of scripture, after all the means which have been employed to reform
mankind, and there are many, the history of mankind is full
of all sorts of philosophies and ideas to reform the nature
of mankind. After all the means which have
been employed to reform mankind, and all the appeals which are
made to them on the score of health and happiness, respectability,
property, and long life, The Word of God is still the most
powerful and the most effectual means of recovering those who
have fallen into vice. No reformation can be permanent
which is not based on the principles of the Word of God, period, full
stop. Scripture alone is all sufficient
for correction. And fourth, it's all sufficient
for training in righteousness. Scripture is profitable or all-sufficient
for training in righteousness. That word training there is paideia.
It's where we get that word to walk around or pediatrician.
It refers to a nurturing or maturing of the faith that we may lead
a good and holy life. If we're born of this word, we
have to be brought up by the word. Man must not only be taught
about God and rebuked when in error and set back right after
sin's destruction, but he also has to be trained regarding right
living. It's sufficient for training
in righteousness. As we saw in Jude, it's even
sufficient for weighing out and balancing doctrines, how we ought
to apply them to our lives. Three, third point, Scripture
alone is all sufficient to make the man of God complete and equipped
for every good work. You can see that in verse 17,
that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
Here we kind of reach the crescendo of Paul's argument. All Scripture
is breathed out by God, theopneustos. It's profitable for teaching,
for rebuke, for correction, and training in righteousness. That,
now what's the that there for? It's a purpose clause. That the
man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. Paul introduces
the result of the training that the scripture alone can produce.
It gives the man of God completeness or adequacy for his task. It fully equips him, as the text
says, for every good work, every good work. Now, I wanna take
a minute just to explain this phrase because many people read
this and think, okay, well, that applies to every Christian. It
does, but only secondarily. Primarily, what's in view in
verse 17 is the task of the pastor. That word man of God is a very
specific phrase. It speaks directly here to Timothy
and all the men of God, like Timothy, who have been commissioned
with the task of shepherding the church." So that phrase,
man of God, is found other places in Scripture. It refers to people
such as Moses, and Samuel, and David, and Elijah, and Elisha.
In his first letter to Timothy, Paul refers to Timothy specifically
using that phrase, man of God, as a designation for the office
of pastor. One theologian says of this,
the fact does not impair the witness of the passage to the
sufficiency of scriptures for Christians in general, it rather
enhances it. If it's sufficient for me and
for Brandon and for Robin to pastor your souls, it's certainly
sufficient for you. It's sufficient for us in every
good work, whatever you may face. Surely, if the Scriptures," he
goes on to say, are sufficient for the multifaceted duties of
the man of God, they must be sufficient to show the ordinary
Christian his path of duty. That's what you expect from your
pastors, right? Where do you want to hear from? You certainly
don't want to hear from this knucklehead. You want to hear from this. This
word is sufficient for my task. This word is sufficient for Robin's
task and Brandon's task. And by that, it's sufficient
for all of life for you. So Paul's point is this, the
man of God is furnished with the perfect, complete revelation
of God, and thus is equipped with everything necessary to
meet all the demands he's been commissioned to do. Why is the
man of God complete, equipped for every good work? Because
of the very nature of Scripture itself. It is perfect, it is
complete, it contains everything necessary for the life of faith. John Gill, in closing this section,
he says this, the design of the scriptures and the end of writing
them are that both preachers of the word and hearers of it
might have a perfect knowledge of the will of God, that the
former might be a complete minister of the gospel and that nothing
might be wanting from the information of the latter. The man of God
has all he needs in God's Word alone. And because of that, the
people of God can be completely cared for. Hallelujah. I want
to give you a few closing observations. Maybe a few of these will be
surprising to you, maybe not. Observation number one. in light
of what we've just discovered. The all-sufficiency of Scripture
is the hearty companion of inerrancy and infallibility. Inerrancy,
what does that mean? That's a big word. The Scripture
is without error, basically you could say that. Infallibility,
the Scripture is incapable of error. But is it not sufficient
as well? I'm gonna give you kind of an
analogy I've thought of over the years because Even in Southern
Baptist churches, there was a recovery of the inerrancy and infallibility
of Scripture. But if you look at their practical
church life, the doctrine of sufficiency has just fallen off
the table. They chant inerrancy, they chant infallibility. The
Bible's inerrant, brothers, but is it sufficient? What does that
mean? I've tried to think of an analogy for this situation. Imagine for a moment that a man
says to his wife, honey, you're perfect, without a flaw, and
you are incapable of a flaw, but you're not enough. How long do you think the warmth
of affection is going to last between those two people? If
you tell your spouse you're perfect, You couldn't be any more flawless,
but you're not enough. It doesn't matter how loudly
you chant inerrancy or infallibility. If she isn't sufficient, it don't
matter. You have just admitted you're
looking somewhere else for what you need. And there are a billion
churches all across this land that profess to love One thing,
but practically love another. Show me practically what a church
does and how those believers worship and live, and I'll show
you whether or not they think the Bible's enough. I really
just kind of go deaf to infallibility and inerrancy. Show me ground
level what a church does, and it'll let you know right up front
if they think the Bible is sufficient. We'd never love our spouse that
way, but we love the Bible that way. It's not enough. We come up with all sorts of
things. So the all-sufficiency of Scripture is the hardy companion.
It's something without which infallibility and inerrancy mean
nothing, really. It's the hardy companion of those
two. Number two, the all-sufficiency of Scripture rules out the oxymoronic
definition of labeling yourself a charismatic Calvinist. The all-sufficiency of Scripture
rules out the oxymoronic definition of labeling yourself a charismatic
Calvinist. Some of your toes may be hurting
right now, it's okay. What is a Reformed charismatic?
It's a person who deeply wants to bridge this massive gap between
sola scriptura, and the affirmation of continuing prophecy in tongues
as revelatory gifts in the church today, and binding on the believer's
conscience. It's a hybrid of two mutually
exclusive ways or systems of thinking. Why am I bringing this
up? There is always the danger of
the sensational. We are still in a body of flesh.
It doesn't take long before, quote, please turn in your Bibles
to 2 Peter 3 becomes boring and the sensational takes its place.
Churches all across the land and around the world will perk
up if a pastor says, on my way to church this morning, God spoke
to me. Your ears just tilt forward.
What's this guy about to say? It's something new from the Lord.
It's more interesting to them. Scripture has become, at that
very moment, subservient to experience. Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary
estimates that in their Center for the Study of Global Christianity,
that over 640 million people call themselves charismatics. I don't know how they get away
with some of these terms. 195 million charismatic Catholics. How is that even possible? 252 million independent Charismatics,
191 million Protestant Charismatics. From 1900, with its humble beginnings
of around 980,000 adherents, to 2020, just over 100 years, this
movement, by my own calculations, has seen a 65,000% increase in
its adherents. It was an utter explosion in
the 1960s. The all-sufficiency of Scripture
and continuing revelation through tongues and prophecy are diametrically
opposed to one another. The Reformation truth of the
all-sufficiency of Scripture stood against Rome for sure,
and it still stands today, but it also stands against any supposed
charismatic Calvinism in our modern Christian culture. If
we're forbidden to add or to take away from the word, it follows
that that word is perfect and complete. This may be an understatement
of the last 2,000 years, but the apostles are dead. The apostolic
age is over. With the apostles' death comes
the cessation of the gifts and any further divine revelation.
As our own confession says, the former ways of God revealing
his will to his church have now ceased. You can be one or you
can be the other consistently, but you cannot be both. It destroys
any oxymoronic definition of trying to label yourself a charismatic
Calvinist. Three, the all-sufficiency of
Scripture guards against potentially disastrous decisions Christians
make based on supposed revelation outside of God's word. The all-sufficiency
of Scripture guards against potentially disastrous decisions Christians
make based on supposed revelation outside of God's Word. Kind of
following up on this previous point that I just made, you wonder
how this unwritten verbal revelation among Reformed charismatics is
not binding on the believer's conscience. Follow me here for
just a minute. It must be asked whether or not
the supposed revelation from God carries the authority of
God with it. In Corinth, it did. In Paul's understanding, the
need to discern the tongue gift exercised in the church in that
classic text in 1 Corinthians 14 seems to necessitate the obedience
in the life of the believers who have now a clearer understanding
of the will of God. When interpreted, the tongue
gift clears up the church's understanding so the believers can live in
obedience to what has been said. If a believer speaks in a tongue
and the tongue is clarified, why clarify what does not need
to be obeyed? Are we just playing church? This
is a clear signal to all who hear that interpretation that
it carries with it the authority of God and thus the will of God.
This supposed revelation is binding on the believer's conscience.
Aside from the many dangers this presents in the modern charismatic
world, the greatest danger is the utter abuse of the believer's
conscience. Now, with a little help from
Nine Marks Ministries, I want to give you a few dangers that
result from binding someone's conscience when it's not according
to the Word of God. You can see these here on your
outline. Number one, those of a tender conscience may fall
into needless fear that they're incurring God's wrath because
they failed to behave in a certain way. Those of a tender conscience
can be crushed apart from the word of God by some standard
imposed upon them. Needless fear, incurring God's
wrath because they failed to behave in a certain way. Number
two, those who tend towards more of a complacency may feel false
assurance that they're spiritually all right because they in fact
have towed the line of the outward behavior being condemned. Nothing
will soothe the alarm of conscience like a shared, manufactured experience
of the spirit in church among your peers. It will just quiet
a conscience, not in a good way. Those who tend towards complacency
feel a false assurance. Number three, those who are pharisaical
may be tempted to look suspiciously at other Christians not following
the command and conclude with this smug satisfaction that those
other believers are less holy. You see, one of the main ideas
behind Charismaticism is the avoidance of looking like a Pharisee
by, quote, sticking to the word alone. You hear this a lot in
Charismatic circles. Those guys who are Reformed,
they're stodgy, they're rigid, and they're word-only people.
They're Pharisees, they stick to the word alone. All the while,
They open up this entire world of looking down their own noses
at those in their estimation who are quote, quenching the
spirit. They're legalists just like the
Pharisees, just in a different way. And fourth, those who are
wavering in the faith may see that the command is foolish or
unreasonable and conclude that God must be a tyrant Our culture
today is full of men and women who left the church because they
came to associate the faith with this arbitrary legalism and petty
taboos of their church culture or communities. Charismaticism
opens up those same dangers. The same dangers that a staunch,
rigid legalism of the fundamentalists open up. It creates taboos and
arbitrary commands that are definitive of their church communities,
and it burns people out. It just burns people out. Fundamentalism,
legalism, and charismaticism end up burning people out because
it's not according to the word. Now, never mind the entire problem
of church discipline among Reformed Charismatics. I really just want
to pose the question, should a believer openly disobey this
word from the Lord? How do they handle that? Do they
bring someone under church discipline for not obeying the tongue that's
been revealed among them? I really do wonder that. I haven't
really gotten a clear answer on that, and I've asked a few
folks. The all-sufficiency of Scripture guards against potential
disastrous decisions Christians make based on supposed revelation
outside of God's Word. Number four, the all-sufficiency
of Scripture compels us to guard our freedom, to guard our freedom. Paul said in Galatians 6.1, for
freedom Christ has set you free. For freedom, Christ has set you
free. Stand firm in the scripture. Let no man put a yoke of slavery
around your neck. You're required to obey only
what God has outlined in his word and in his word alone, period. We are slaves to no man's conscience,
to no man's tradition, and to no claims of messages from God
apart from scripture. The supreme judge by whom all
matters of spiritual life are to be determined is none other
than the holy scripture. David put it well in the Psalms,
I shall walk in liberty for I have sought your precepts. The word
of God is the ultimate freedom we have. And fifth and finally
observation here, the all sufficiency of scripture tells us that we
must stick to what is written. The all-sufficiency of Scripture
tells us that we must stick to what is written. Paul says in
1 Corinthians 4, do not go beyond what is written. The secret things
belong to the Lord our God. They are his. Don't try to pry
open that door. Don't try to take things that
are not yours. But that very same verse says, the things that
are revealed belong to you. They belong to us. That's Deuteronomy
29. Use them. The things that belong
to us are enough, beloved, for every trial. They're enough for
every tear. They're enough for every decision.
It's enough for salvation. It's enough for life. It's enough
when facing the great enemy of death. His word will sustain
you even in that dark hour. The word of God, beloved, is
enough. It's enough. Add nothing to it,
take nothing away from it, and equate nothing with it. Do not
go beyond what is written. For this word is not an empty
word for you. It is, as Deuteronomy says, your
very life. There are only two options, beloved.
Either scripture is sufficient or it's not. Take your pick. It's either authoritative or
it's not. We say it is. Let us live and worship like
it is. Amen? Let's pray. Oh Lord, we thank you now for
the clarity of your word, which gives us just a bedrock of hope. When our minds are scattered
with trials, when our hearts are wrenched with doubts and
fears, whatever they may be, we have a sure refuge. We have
a sure hope, we have clear, wise guidance from you. It's in your holy word. Help
us to not look anywhere else, Lord. In Christ's name we pray,
amen.
The Sufficiency of Scripture
Series Topical
| Sermon ID | 121242023502386 |
| Duration | 52:44 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday - AM |
| Bible Text | 2 Timothy 3:14-17 |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.