We are starting the Millennial reign of the Messiah, the Messianic reign. We're going to be on 387 of your book if you want to follow along. 387. You should have a outline, I think, in your book. It shows the two branches of government during the Millennial reign. And that should be the front page of your book. You have a Gentile branch and a Jewish branch, and we're going to talk about that. Okay, so just as we're getting ready to talk about the messianic government of the Messiah, it's very detailed. It's very understandable, but I must tell you this as a believer, that everything you do as a believer when you got saved is being obviously tracked, so to speak. You know, the Messiah is omniscient and he knows everything we do. But the point that when you got saved is what is now being looked at as your inheritance. and what you will get in your inheritance as a believer. And one of the inheritances is to rule and reign with the Messiah. Not all believers will rule and reign with the Messiah. Not all believers will participate in his government. It doesn't work like it's an automatic. Yes, there are passive rewards that every believer gets, like a resurrected body, and then there are active rewards which are earned. We don't earn salvation, but we earn rewards. And you must understand which are passive and which are active. So let me ask you this. Is an inheritance an automatic or a reward? An inheritance. Is it an automatic? Just think about your kids. Let's say you're gonna leave them your millions that you've saved up, okay? And you're saying, I got all these millions, man, and here's my son, Joe Blow, and I'm going to leave him $10 million because I've saved up enough in my retirement. Is it an automatic that you're going to give your son your inheritance? Why would you not give your son the inheritance? Why would you not want to even just give them a dollar or anything? I mean, what would cause you as a parent to say, you know what? Not happening. I know you're my son. I love you, but I'm not giving you my $10 million. What would cause you to do that and say, I'm going to give it to. Sally two trees across the street or something like that. I don't know Why would you as a parent? Disinherit your child maybe the way they would use it or how about this? They lived a life in their adulthood that simply doesn't deserve Anything I give them How about that one? That they live such of a life that I don't trust them to give them money. I don't want to reward them for the kind of life they live. I would rather reward the neighbor kid across the street because he seems like a good guy. He at least talks to me, but my own son doesn't even talk to me. My own son lives the life the way he wants to live. So why would I feel like giving him anything? You see where I'm going with this as a parent? And by the way, there's a principle out here in raising kids. Don't raise a kid to when he becomes an adult, you don't like him. No, that's a legitimate principle. And a lot of parents come back and say, man, I love my kids, but I don't like them. They're turned into jerks, boy or girl. And he's just like, I don't even want to be around them anymore. I can't believe this is from my same stock. That is more common than you think. It is extremely common that parents simply don't like their kids because of the way they act. And they just don't have anything to do with them. And so a lot of kids get disinherited. And I'm at the funerals a lot of times. I'm in the prep room with all the funerals and they're fighting like cats and dogs because mom or dad left all their money to this person, this brother or sister. And the other ones got disinherited and they got left a dollar. so they can't contest the will. And I'm there watching the fight. And I see it often, okay? Why did they give the $1 to the brother and sister over here, but then they left everything to Billy? It's because Billy was respectful to their parents. He's not crazy, he's not wild, he doesn't do anything. He's good guy, just relatively speaking, right? But these two over here, one's a witch and one's a warlock. and they're like, I don't want anything to do with these creeps. Yeah, I know they're my kids, but they treat me like trash. So they're gonna give it to Billy. Okay, so you all know that as a parent or a grandparent. Hence, the same is true with the Messiah and us. You're adopted into the family of God, no doubt about it. And you have that right as a child to be in the family And let me ask you this, to get into the family, Jesus told Nicodemus something that you, the only way you're going to see the family is this. What did he say to Nicodemus? To do what? To enter the kingdom of God. You must be born again to enter the kingdom of God, okay? Notice this precision that the Messiah said. He didn't say to inherit the kingdom of God. He said to enter the kingdom of God. All believers enter the kingdom of God, but not all believers receive an inheritance. because you can squander your inheritance as a believer, much like the famous story of who? The prodigal son. And you know what happened with the prodigal son. He did what to his inheritance? Squandered it. Now, could he return home? Absolutely. But he returned home without an inheritance, because he had squandered it by riotous living. So he could always come home, but in effect, he lost his reward or inheritance. Hence, this is why Hebrews 6, this is why there's warnings all over scripture about the possibility of believers losing rewards. and the writer of Hebrews will use the Kadesh Barnea, Exodus group, because they didn't do certain things like going to the promised land, but they lost rewards, even temporal rewards. So when you're studying the messianic period, you must understand this is your reward. This is what you get. And you want to participate in the higher echelons of the government of the Messiah. If not, you will be considered least in the kingdom of heaven or the kingdom of God. And no one wants to be there. So everything you do depends on how you're behaving right now. Everything. And that's all weighed and found in the balances, so to speak, of our reward in this era. So, that being stated, this is why this is extremely important, not only to understand, but also to live it out. Okay, so obviously on your page, you can see the two branches. They don't want to take care of you. Yeah, you'll have people in here who will love to take care of you. Well, I think that's the thing is if you have kids that are. dirty, rotten scoundrels, so to speak, and they're useless as a bump on a pickle. What I would advocate is you find someone that's worthy enough to, A, inherit what you have, B, to take care of you or whatever, and then don't feel any shame of funneling that money to someone else or another organization. Some people, because their kids are so goofballed, will give it to like a ministry like aerial ministries or Jews for Jesus or and they'll just give all their stuff as an inherited because they look at their family like I don't want them to have this they don't deserve anything they're useless and so at that point you start finding if you already sense that and you already see that in your family life like hey I don't have anyone to give this to then give it to a ministry like you know I don't know Jews for Jesus or something well I'm not gonna speak for us but But you know what I'm saying, you find a ministry that, hey, I know this is gonna go towards the Lord's work. Or like Steve Kern, you give to Good News in Action or something like that and say, Steve, you're doing a great job. I would feel better with my money with someone like Steve getting the job done versus giving a kid that's gonna buy a car with it. It has no way. So you even could earn rewards by investing in the ministry, so to speak, even when you're not here. You know, so that's what I would start thinking about. I know. It's that whole bonding, and I get it. But let me ask you this, guys. I know we're doing an excursus right now, but you're making a good point. Because a lot of parents, because they have no good kids, feel guilty for leaving them a dollar in the will. I tell them, I wouldn't feel guilty at all leaving them a buck if they treated me like junk all my whole life and disrespected me. And so what ends up happening, and Tom's making a good point, people are fooled by the bond with their child rather than understanding what love is. And what do I mean by that? The first person typically that you bond to as a parent is your child. You bond to them. It's an automatic. A lot of it's chemistry, a lot of it's biology, because you give up oxytocin, I think the chemical is called. When you hold a child, you give off a chemical, the child gets off a chemical, and the chemical bonds you to the kid. And that instantly does that to you, and you're bonded. But it doesn't necessarily mean there's love there. It should be, but it doesn't necessarily mean that. So I'll give you another example. Teenagers having sex in the backseat of a car will also bond because their chemicals are thawing off oxytocin and all the serotonin and dopamine releases that happen in the brain and they become bonded and they're not even married. And you already know that teenagers in the backseat of a car don't necessarily love each other. They don't even know what love is. They're having sex. But the sex act is actually bonding them to each other chemically. Okay. So what happens to a lot of parents is they are bonded to their kids. but they don't necessarily like their kids and they're conflicted with that and they don't understand how that works. Well, you have to separate your bond versus love and respect in different categories. There's no doubt you're bonded to your kids, but that bond doesn't necessarily transfer into love or like. And so you don't need to feel guilty if all your life, your parents, your kids or whoever has disrespected you. You're bonded, there's no doubt about it, but don't confuse the bond with love. You don't. Now, the kind of love I'm talking about is I'm not talking about agape love. You're supposed to love everyone agape, right? You seek the best for them. But with parent-child, you have storge and you have phileo, Philadelphia love or storge love, which is family love is storge and Philadelphia love is kind of like friendship love. Maybe you have the relationship with an adult child that you have Philadelphia too, that you like to be around them, that you have a friendship with them. But storge doesn't necessitate Philadelphia. It's a natural parent love or parent bond. Agape is automatic, you must seek the best, but a lot of those other loves are not required of you. Philadelphia love is not required of you, of other people. Agape is, but this is why you can agape your enemies. Right? You have to love your enemies. You seek the best for your enemies. But I don't need to have Storge for them, nor do I need to have Philadelphia for an enemy. So you have to know what love is required of you. Hence, when parents get confused, they don't know what love is required. So they think it's Storge, it's Philadelphia, they think it's all that stuff mixed into a big ball. And it's not. You have to know what is required of you. You're required to agape everybody. you're not required to Philadelphia. And that would be you being able to say, I love my kids, I seek the best for them, but I don't like them. And that's totally legitimate, totally biblical. Hence, don't confuse your store gay bond, that's my son, that's my daughter with Philadelphia. I would not, don't do that. The minute you confuse that, that's when you're gonna start feeling guilty. When you disinherit your kids, if you do. But to Tom's point, that's where the confusion comes in. And so what they do is they give a dirty rat the money to soothe their guilt, and you know that dirty rat's gonna go out and turn and buy drugs. And they say, well, I can't control it. That's on him. That's on him. No, no, no. It's on you. You knew if you gave him money, what he would do with the money. He would run off to Vegas and put it on the roulette table and vote, you know, or, you know, put it on black and then get rid of all the money. So why did you do that? Well, I felt guilty because it's my son and that's human guilt. You're not understanding where your bonds are. So, as a parent, don't get confused with your bonds. That's what a lot of people have trouble with. They're bonded, but that doesn't necessarily mean love is there. Or Philadelphia love, if that makes sense. And then when you can parse that out, then you can really see your kids, or parents, I hate to say that, in a good light. Because sometimes you look at your parents and you're like, I don't get them. I totally don't get them. They're out of touch. They're on the verge of going crazy. And in a good sense, because you're like, they're not making sense anymore. They're doing wild, crazy things. And I can't believe these are my parents. Dude, that's more common than when you think to watch their own parents. When you become an adult, apparently, and you get into reality out of childhood, you start seeing your parents for what they really were or are. And you're like, hmm, that's not really good what they were doing. And people get conflicted, well I shouldn't be thinking about that because I'm bonded to them. But let me ask you this question. In the Ten Commandments, nine of them have transferred over to the church. You still have to do number five. But have you ever read what it really says? You shall honor your father and mother It uses the word honor. How come it doesn't use the word love? You ever thought of that? Why does the commandment not say you shall love your father and mother? It doesn't say love. It says honor. Oh, well, that's a whole new ball game then. What would be implied by God not using? He could easily use the word in Hebrew, hesed, loving kindness. Use hesed towards your father and mother, but he uses the word honor, which is another word for respect. He's only asking you, I just need you to respect your parents. I'm not even asking you to love them. What? Have you ever thought about that? Why doesn't the commandment say love and honor? Why does he exclude love out of that? Just take a guess. Well, yeah, I mean, respect. Okay, so like, think about an authoritarian situation. Think about in a military. Thinking about that you're in a military and you have a sergeant over you, but the sergeant's a jerk. Do you still salute him? Yes. You still respect what? the authority, the office, but I may not like the individual in the position. The Bible and God assumes that predominantly people may not love or like their own family. Hence is only asking you to respect them. Treat them with respect. God anticipates it's possible you may not love your parents. Let that sit for a while. What does he tell the wife to do to the husband? But he doesn't use what? What does that text say? She's to respect. It doesn't say she's to love. What's that? Right. What if the parents are not honorable? Well, then you do it from afar. What if the sergeant's not honorable? What would you do in a military situation like that? You couldn't do anarchy. You couldn't raise your fist against the authority, because that authority, according to Peter, is put in your life for a particular reason. So you would have to submit to that authority without getting in their face or whatnot. And so you would not be able to do passive aggressive behavior like people do with their parents. They won't confront them, but they'll just do end arounds on them all the time. You can't do that. You just can't leave them out there. You're required to take care of them if they're ailing or failing in their health. Okay, because people, Paul says if you don't take care of your family, you're worse than an infidel. So I'm not talking about, I'm not talking about, I'm talking about dependent parents that need help, okay? But it doesn't mean that I'm even required to love them. I may not. I may despise what they have done to me. then yeah, all bets are off at that point in time. They kick you out and say, well not kick you out, but kick you out of their life. Then yeah, all bets are off and you have to love them or respect them from afar and just say, I agape them, I hope the best. Sure, because they don't want you around. I can tell you this, a lot of family dynamics, people don't even talk to their parents because the parents are just so ridiculous, they're virtually unable to have a relationship. So are kids, so are adult kids. The parents will look at them and say, I don't want to have a relationship with them, they're crazy. You're right, yeah, you honor God first before someone would make you do something bad like that, obviously. So I don't know, I know that's an Ascursus, but again, Christ is watching all of our relationships and how we function here will really depend on how we get our inheritance in the next life. And I can tell you this, guys, I can tell you this. All this stuff that we're learning all has to do with how you relate to another person. All of it. What God has made is he has a system that's very relational. And the challenge for believers is how to function multiple relationships that are sometimes twisted off, sometimes are good, sometimes are bad. And your ability to navigate successfully through relationships is how you're going to get your reward. because a lot of what you do for Christ is tied to your relationships. For instance, if you're a detached person, and you withdraw, and you kind of like get away from everybody, and you don't mix, you don't socialize, you don't connect to other people, how can you serve the body of Christ? You can't, because you're isolated, you're alone, you're by yourself. So if you keep to yourself and say, well, it's just gonna be me and Jesus, and I'm gonna read my Bible for three hours a day, and then I'm good, and then I just go off into the sunset by myself, That ain't cutting it. Because at what point are you ministering to anybody in the body of Christ other than yourself? And at what point are you evangelizing? That's it. And he's gonna say, hey, I like that you had a three hour quiet time with me, but what did you do for me? Well, I read the Bible. Yeah, but why didn't you do what I told you to do actively? And that's where it starts coming into like, oh, that's where the rubber meets the road. Yeah, you gotta do something about this. And so part of reigning and ruling, as you see in this environment that you're gonna see, has to do with how you're functioning correctly now. It is imperative that any baggage that's keeping you from serving properly, keeping you from proper relationships, is preventing you from being rewarded. You have to understand that. And at the beam of seat of Christ, it's very possible you're gonna watch a lot of believers simply lose everything. Everything. They'll escape as one escaping by fire, 1 Corinthians 3, but because they became internally focused and self-absorbed as a believer, they can't be rewarded for anything. They simply won't rule and reign. And here's the deal, as we get ready to study this, If you think that ruling and reigning is not appealing to you, then you simply don't understand it. Because a lot of people, when you talk about ruling and reigning, they're like, I don't want to be in charge of anything. And I'm like, OK. But that's not what this is about. I was a boss of my company and it's just a bunch of headaches and stress and I don't want to do that. So this is not appealing to me. I don't want to be responsible for anybody. I'm too responsible now. And this doesn't appeal to me, Brandon. Then what's happening is you're missing information. And because you're missing that kind of information, It doesn't appeal to you. But if you look at this in the sense of a fairy tale, so to speak, not that this is a fairy tale, but as stories are written, like Cinderella. Those stories have eternal motifs in them that signal, wouldn't it be nice to be king? Wouldn't it be nice to be queen for a day? Wouldn't it be nice to have everything you possibly could have imagined serve to you? and you not lift a finger. Wouldn't it be nice to have people and servants at your disposal to do what you need them to do in a right way? I mean, that's a fairytale that you tell the kids, right? But you know why that's appealing to even adults? Is because deep down inside, there is a yearning to be king and queen. because our first kings and queens blew it. And we have lost our royalty. We have lost our positions. And what Jesus did is not only get our salvation back, but he got our kingdom back, our royalty back. That's why he's a kinsman redeemer, is to give you the fairy tale that you lost. And so that's why those little stories that you read to your grandkids and kids about being a king for a day or a queen for a day and Cinderella and all these stories are extremely appealing. So if you peel away all the baggage, it really is our heart's desire to be in that position. You mean I don't have to scrub toilets anymore? No. Like Cinderella who was scrubbing the floors while her evil twin sisters are ruling. Think about Cinderella. What is so appealing in that story? Well, that's a girl's story. No, no, no, there's themes in there that are universal. That's why it's so appealing. Because two of the sisters who are getting away with things, not serving, not doing anything, while Cinderella's serving. What happens is there's a reversal of fortunes. She goes from the pit to the palace. That's us. That's us. That's the whole thing. Snow White. What is the idea? It's the kiss of life from the Messiah to wake us up out of death and to establish us as royalty. You see the themes all in these little character stories. is appealing to us because we want our positions back. We know we're supposed to rule and reign. It's intuitive, but that's been beat out of us. We think it's going to be like being a president of the United States. It's not like that. It is stress free. There is no stress ruling and reigning with Jesus. It is the ultimate position to have. It is the ultimate. So if you like taking vacations, if you like going to a day spa and all those little nooks and crannies where you get a little piece of serenity, you get a little piece of quiet and peace and calm in your life, all those little bits and pieces, imagine times a hundred all the time. That's what he's talking about. And that's not even heaven. I'm not even talking about heaven. I'm talking about the kingdom. And this is what a lot of people have a concept. They have a hard time grasping because they think it's, well, it's going to be like a CEO and I'm at Walmart and I'm managing a bunch of Walmartians and that's what they think it is. And I don't want to manage them because they're all having problems. I get it, but it's not this world. Not this world. Real quick, as you can see on the table, before we get into this, we'll spend some time. There's obviously Jesus as king at the top, right? And then you have the Gentile branch of government. That's where you and I will be in that Gentile branch if you're rewarded. You have the church and the tribulation saints. Underneath them, you'll have kings. And under them, you'll have the Gentile nations. On the other side is the Jewish branch. King David will be a co-regent with Messiah in Jerusalem. Then under him are the 12 apostles who will rule over the 12 tribes. Under them are princes. We don't know who they are, but they'll be Jewish princes. Under them is judges and counselors. Under that, the nation of Israel. And the nation of Israel rules over the Gentiles. It's the head of the nations, not the tail. So here's the thing, before we get into the Jewish branch, the Gentile branch is where you will be. If I am in the Gentile branch of government, if I am rewarded with a position there, then take a guess where you will be on planet Earth. If you're part of the Gentile branch, where then will you rule and reign on planet Earth? It could be right here in Bakersfield. Hawaii maybe, I don't know, depends. It will not be Jerusalem. It will not be Israel, because who inhabits the kingdom, that location? The Jewish branch, right? Okay. Now, it doesn't mean that you won't go to Israel and go to Jerusalem. You will go there and visit the king, and you will go there, especially on the Feast of Tabernacles, to visit the Messiah, but you have direct access to the Messiah through prayer, and he talks to you, and you talk to him, and he knows before you speak, he answers you. So you have instant contact with Jesus all the time, but your location will be somewhere on planet Earth other than the nation of Israel. Because as you can see, you have to be Jewish to be in that, that's a Jewish branch of government. So the theory, and again, it's all theory at this point in time, because we just don't know, is that you will probably rule and reign from the location where you typically lived on planet Earth here and now. Hence, your dreams of ever leaving Bakersfield, I have just squashed. You are here for a thousand years. That's theory. But why would you not? You've been trained to live in Bakersfield all your life. Wouldn't you be the perfect ruler for Bakersfield? Because you know all the streets, you know where oil is at, you know where all the roads are at. Sure. But no, no, the thing about it is, is you got to remember the planet is going to be completely Edenized, if you want to say that. It's turned back into paradise. So Bakersfield will not look like Bakersfield. The whole planet will be restored to paradise in its Edenic conditions. And so we don't necessarily know where you will be. Maybe you will be here on this stretch of earth, but imagine just all parts of earth being paradise. Like all the earth being tropical or like Hawaiian or just imagine a perfect environment. So it's theory that you'll perhaps be where you grew up or where you lived at primarily. But again, the conditions are far different than what you can imagine. Yeah, I know. In some ways, it might be, because let's put it this way. If you become the mayor of Alpaw, and you're the ruler of Alpaw, you didn't do well, okay? Or you're the mayor of McFarland, and that was all because, hey man, there was a gap in your game somewhere, and you dropped the ball at some point in time. But the higher up you are in the government, the more you rule over others. So you expand your ministry. Now you will have an expanded kingdom. So you might be over 20 realms. Hence, that's why you have the parable in Luke of the Minas. And they come back and they were faithful with the Minas and he goes, you will be ruler over 10 cities or you will be ruler over five cities. And that idea there of rulership over cities, you can see that if you do dwell here, you will rule over many cities. And we just don't take that in a metaphorical sense. We take that in that he's really meaning that. It's a ruling aspect. That being the case, The issue of Israel, as you can see, and we'll take a break in just about five minutes, the Jewish branch, before we get any into this, I want you to notice that the nation of Israel rules over the Gentiles in the bottom of the graph. Do you see that? That is extremely important to understand because the goal of Israel was always to be the head nation. Always, that was the idea, that they would be the priestly nation, the mediatorial nation, that would be able to tell the good news of Yahweh to all the nations. Obviously, they failed at that, right? But in their restored position, they will eventually do this and actually Gentiles will grab them and say you know Yahweh tell us who he is according to Zechariah and so they'll eventually become the head of the nations. Now I think I left you with a quandary last time and I think you solved it because this idea of being the head nation has to do with birthright okay has to do with the birthright and I asked you one time What was the sin of Ham? And I think you came up with it, right? You remember what the sin of Ham was? Noah's drunk and covered his father's nakedness. And a lot of people miss that, mess that whole scene up. You have to marry that with Leviticus 18 or 19. You remember that he slept with his mom. She becomes pregnant and Noah curses the grandchild. Right? Okay. What was the name of the grandchild? Canaan. Yeah? Okay. And then hence the Canaanites were in the land when Joshua came in there. You got that. But one aspect that it didn't bring out to you is why did Ham do this? You think, was he just a sexual pervert? No. Why would he go and sleep with his mom while Noah was alive? Authority. But what kind of authority? Because if you recall, it happened several times in the Old Testament. One was with David's son, Absalom. Absalom slept with the harem of David while David's alive in full view of Israel. And what was the other patriarch that did that? I was just reading this the other day. Oh, Reuben. Reuben slept with a concubine of his dad. Why is dad's alive? Do you remember that? Okay, so we had several instances where the boys did that. So you have to think Middle Eastern and understand what's going on here. In the Middle East and the way they think is the firstborn has the rights of the family, rights of inheritance, rights of rulership, rights of everything. Who is Noah's oldest boy? Is it Shem, Ham or Japheth? The order of the name should give you a clue in the Hebraic culture. The oldest boy is always named first. So who's the oldest? Huh? Shem. Shem is the oldest. Shem, Ham and Japheth. Or Shem, Japheth and Ham or whatever. Ham is the youngest by the way. At least we know, maybe from the order, we cannot be dogmatic, but we know the first name is always the oldest. So it's Shem. Shem is the oldest. Hence, if Noah dies, Shem is the family clan leader. The younger boys don't get firstborn inheritance rights. Okay? So what's Moses trying to do by showing this scene in regards to Israel? Who does Israel, who did they descend from? Shem. They're from Shem. Who is what? The firstborn, who should get all family rights, should get all land rights. Not Ham, the Hamites do not possess rights, per se, of the designated areas that God will give to the Shemites, or the descendants of Shem. Israel is from Shem. Moses is trying to show us in the story of Noah, that's why it's in there, that the right to the land of Israel all goes all the way back to even Noah, because not only has God made a land covenant with Israel, but they have primogenitor. They are the firstborn. and they descend from Shem. Hence, they have the right to the land. The Canaanites are cursed and are the youngest or maybe the second oldest, doesn't matter. But it doesn't matter where they're at in the family tree. They don't have the rights of the firstborn. Therefore, they don't have the right to the land. And that would go true with Japheth as well. Japheth does not have a right to the land either. So the two boys cannot claim what the firstborn has. And the firstborn has the land. What land? We know it as the promised land. Moses is trying to prove this point, and he's making a very good argument about it, and why the Canaanites deserve to be driven off the land. It's not theirs. Hence, on the table to the nations, Israel is in her primogeniture position as firstborn. She is a firstborn. God calls Israel a firstborn. Hence, firstborn has double inheritance. But when a firstborn messes up, they get double condemnation. But in this sense, now they have their rights put back to them and they are the head of the nations and they are where? Right where their land was supposed to be. It's all been made right now. And this goes all the way back to the three boys from Noah. Isn't that crazy? That's amazing. That's amazing how detailed and connected most things are, even with the land. The land is the issue for Israel. So you know what the new anti-Semitism is today? Anti-Zionism. Churches are saying that Israel doesn't have the right to the land. That's the new motive out there. Oh, they say, oh, I'm not anti-Semitic. They're just anti-Zion. Well, if you're anti-Zion, you're anti-Bible, anti-God, anti-Lamb covenant, anti-Abrahamic covenant, and you don't understand the story of Noah and how Ham uncovered his nakedness. Isn't that amazing? But yet most churches, the pastor, whatever, is teaching anti-Zionism. Oh my goodness. And right here before you, the whole messianic kingdom is about putting Israel back in its place. Its rightful place as primogenitor. As primogenitor. As primogenitor. As primogenitor. As primogenitor.